1989
DOI: 10.1051/forest:198905art0169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Succession of mycorrhizae: a matter of tree age or stand age?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a succession has been proposed by Dighton and Mason (1985), whilst Blasius and Oberwinkler (1989) provided evidence that stage of succession was likely to be more important than age of tree in determining type of mycorrhizal development and fungal species. Warcup (1991) has reported that the main early colonisers of eucalypt seedlings after fire are pyrophilous ascomycetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such a succession has been proposed by Dighton and Mason (1985), whilst Blasius and Oberwinkler (1989) provided evidence that stage of succession was likely to be more important than age of tree in determining type of mycorrhizal development and fungal species. Warcup (1991) has reported that the main early colonisers of eucalypt seedlings after fire are pyrophilous ascomycetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This was also suggested by Blasius and Oberwinkler (1989). However, laboratory experiments on the sensitivity of several ectomycorrhizal fungi to litter extracts indicated that sensitivity to (nitrogen-rich) pine needle and grass litter extracts can only partly explain ectomycorrhizal impoverishment during stand development (Baar et al, 1994).…”
Section: Ectomycorrhizal Fungimentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Sod cutting enhanced sporocarp formation of several ectomycorrhizal species in the medium‐aged and old stands (e.g., C. perennis, Inocybe lacera, Laccaria bicolor, R. luteolus, and Suillus bovinus ), suggesting that sporocarp formation of ectomycorrhizal fungi is reduced by the presence of thick litter and humus layers (Blasius & Oberwinkler 1989;de Vries et al 1995) with relatively high concentrations of nitrogen (Baar & ter Braak 1996). Field observations also suggest that sporocarp formation of ectomycorrhizal fungi is suppressed by thick litter and humus layers and that sporocarps are more abundant in nutrient‐poor forests with thin litter and humus layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%