2016
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Succession, climate and neighbourhood dynamics influence tree growth over time: an 87‐year record of change in aPinus resinosa‐dominated forest, Minnesota,USA

Abstract: Question Resource availability and its influence on tree‐to‐tree interactions are expected to change over the course of forest stand development, but the rarity of long‐term data sets has limited examinations of neighbourhood crowding over extended time periods. How do a history of neighbourhood interactions and population‐level dynamics, including demographic transition, impact long‐term tree growth? Location Natural mature Pinus resinosa‐dominated forest in northern Minnesota, USA. Methods Using a spatially … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, red pine stand density is positively linked to drought susceptibility both at the scale of individual trees (Curzon et al. 2016) and stands (Gleason et al. 2017), with denser stands less resistant and resilient to drought (Magruder et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, red pine stand density is positively linked to drought susceptibility both at the scale of individual trees (Curzon et al. 2016) and stands (Gleason et al. 2017), with denser stands less resistant and resilient to drought (Magruder et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher pine stand densities, increased fuel loads, and ladder fuels will increase the severity of the next fire to burn in these stands and potentially convert long-lived red pine woodlands to forest conditions more reflective of severe, standreplacing fires such as aspen or jack pine. Furthermore, red pine stand density is positively linked to drought susceptibility both at the scale of individual trees (Curzon et al 2016) and stands (Gleason et al 2017), with denser stands less resistant and resilient to drought (Magruder et al 2013. The current status of nearly every red pine-dominated stand we surveyed included negligible red pine regeneration, higher stand density than at any point in recent centuries, a transition to non-red pine species, and fuel loads more amenable to catastrophic stand-replacing fire than maintenance surface fire, reflecting findings in other red pinedominated landscapes (Meunier et al 2019a).…”
Section: Red Pine Forest Types Cannot Be Perpetuated Without Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also suggest that this mechanism stops operating at the sapling survival stage (given the prevalence of null models for this life cycle phase), but this could be due to analytical limitations such as insufficient statistical power (small number of saplings) or the lack of separability (with almost all saplings surviving or dying). Nevertheless, previous reports also point to sapling survival being indifferent to biological neighbourhood (Comita et al, 2014;Curzon et al, 2017;Metz et al, 2010;Velázquez et al, 2016).…”
Section: Consequences For Diversity Maintenancementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Specifically, conspecific neighbours generally affect the spadistribution of sapling density to somewhat larger distances (15 m) than for seed bank and seed rain densities. Therefore, it appears that seed and sapling densities in the vicinity of conspecific trees are not driven by the same processes (Curzon et al, 2017).…”
Section: Patterns Of Neighbourhood Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation