2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful Use of Sternal-Sparing Minimally Invasive Surgery for Proximal Ascending Aortic Pathology

Abstract: A sternal-sparing approach to surgery of the proximal aorta is safe when performed by an experienced surgeon and conserves hospital resources.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is associated with shorter recovery time and reduced blood loss. 19 The major disadvantage of this procedure is the longer circulatory arrest time required compared with traditional approaches. Meticulous attention to maintaining hemostasis is critical in this approach, because bleeding will be more difficult to control, particularly at the left main coronary artery anastomosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is associated with shorter recovery time and reduced blood loss. 19 The major disadvantage of this procedure is the longer circulatory arrest time required compared with traditional approaches. Meticulous attention to maintaining hemostasis is critical in this approach, because bleeding will be more difficult to control, particularly at the left main coronary artery anastomosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a longer circulatory arrest times in the minimally invasive group, stroke rate, as well as the transfusion requirements, ventilation times, as well as the ICU and hospital stays were less than the sternotomy group. 35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 The initial outcomes of the first reported minimally invasive, right minithoracotomy replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve in 20 patients was excellent; with no strokes, reoperations for bleeding, conversions to sternotomy, or 30-day mortality. 46 In 2018, Lamelas et al 47 further described their experience with sternalsparing replacement of the ascending aorta, with or without a concomitant aortic valve replacement, via a right mini-thoracotomy in 74 patients. This study was followed by a propensity score-matched analysis performed between 63 patients undergoing a sternotomy and an equivalent number of patients undergoing a minimally invasive nonsternotomy approach.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes From Studies Utilizing Both Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite longer circulatory arrest times in the minimally invasive group, stroke rate, ventilation times, transfusion requirements, and length of ICU and hospital stays were less than in the sternotomy group. 47…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes From Studies Utilizing Both Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%