2021
DOI: 10.6002/ect.2020.0277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful Use of Rifamycin-Sparing Regimens for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis in Lung Transplant Recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One center used INH, EMB, and a fluoroquinolone for up to 18 months with reported success in liver transplant recipients [60]. Another center used INH, EMB, PZA, and moxifloxacin in seven lung transplant recipients for 9-12 months with good safety and efficacy, though INH was changed to RFB in two cases because of INH resistance [59]. Improved outcomes and reduced rejection with RIF-sparing regimen were reported in one series [56].…”
Section: Management Of Tuberculosis Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One center used INH, EMB, and a fluoroquinolone for up to 18 months with reported success in liver transplant recipients [60]. Another center used INH, EMB, PZA, and moxifloxacin in seven lung transplant recipients for 9-12 months with good safety and efficacy, though INH was changed to RFB in two cases because of INH resistance [59]. Improved outcomes and reduced rejection with RIF-sparing regimen were reported in one series [56].…”
Section: Management Of Tuberculosis Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreased prevalence of 'classic' chest radiograph findings in SOT recipients [11,53,59] has biologic plausibility [70]. Lung injury in TB-infected patients is typically mediated by complex hostpathogen interactions, with cytokines (e.g.…”
Section: Management Of Tuberculosis Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13][14][15] Therefore, a rifampin-sparing regimen has been attempted in SOT recipients to avoid this risk of lower bioavailability of an immunosuppressive agent. 16,17 Alternatively, rifabutin can be chosen as a reliable substitute to rifampin in these patients, 18,19 considering that rifabutin has comparable potent activity against M. tuberculosis with rifampin, 20 although rifabutin is a less potent inducer of the cytochrome P450 3A4 microsomal enzyme. [21][22][23] However, as previous studies on the clinical experience of the use of rifabutin in SOT recipients have been limited, little is known about the change in the drug level and need for dose adjustment of calcineurin inhibitor when calcineurin inhibitor used with rifabutin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as rifampin is a potent inducer of the cytochrome P450 3A4 microsomal enzyme, its use inadvertently results in the development of acute rejection or graft loss when it is administered with calcineurin inhibitors by reducing the blood levels of calcineurin inhibitors 13–15 . Therefore, a rifampin‐sparing regimen has been attempted in SOT recipients to avoid this risk of lower bioavailability of an immunosuppressive agent 16,17 . Alternatively, rifabutin can be chosen as a reliable substitute to rifampin in these patients, 18,19 considering that rifabutin has comparable potent activity against M. tuberculosis with rifampin, 20 although rifabutin is a less potent inducer of the cytochrome P450 3A4 microsomal enzyme 21–23 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%