1994
DOI: 10.1681/asn.v491719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful use of cuffed central venous hemodialysis catheters inserted percutaneously.

Abstract: Although endogenous fistulae and grafts are preferred for permanent hemodialysis access, central venous catheters are often required for varying intervals when creating permanent access is not feasible. The prospective experience with 118 catheters in over a 3.5-yr period is reported; 93 (79%) were placed by percutaneous techniques, and 25 (21%) were placed by operative techniques. Seventy seven catheters (65%) were placed in the subclavian vein, 36 (31%) were placed in the internal jugular vein (usually right… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Catheter thrombosis is the most common reason for catheter removal and re-insertion. [12][13][14] Until today, many studies have been conducted on catheter thrombosis, and many risk factors such as sex, race, catheter insertion site, diabetes mellitus, and locking solutions have been identified. [15][16][17][18] It has been found on occasion that even if there is no mechanical problem associated with the catheter, in some patients, TDC loses functionality in a shorter time than expected, and the necessity of frequent intra-catheter thrombolytic therapy arises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catheter thrombosis is the most common reason for catheter removal and re-insertion. [12][13][14] Until today, many studies have been conducted on catheter thrombosis, and many risk factors such as sex, race, catheter insertion site, diabetes mellitus, and locking solutions have been identified. [15][16][17][18] It has been found on occasion that even if there is no mechanical problem associated with the catheter, in some patients, TDC loses functionality in a shorter time than expected, and the necessity of frequent intra-catheter thrombolytic therapy arises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KDOQI Vascular Access Guideline Work Group considers a sufficient extracorporeal blood flow to be 300 ml/min [ 2 ]. Approximately 50% of HD catheters fail within one year [ 3 ]; up to two-thirds of the failures are due to thrombosis [ 4 - 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Approximately 50% of CVC failed within 1 year 4 and up to two-thirds of failures were due to thrombosis. 5 The clinical impact of CRT is poorer clearance of uremic toxins, such as decreased KT/V. In addition, CRT was also associated with increased risks of missing dialysis session, hospitalization, and mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%