1998
DOI: 10.1097/00063110-199809000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful use of an intraosseous infusion in an 800 grams preterm infant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of IO infusion over peripheral vascular access is that it provides a rapid and reliable access to the systemic venous circulation in children [ 21 23 ]. It can be used in children of all ages, with the smallest child reported in literature weighing 800 g [ 24 ]. This has led to IO infusion having almost completely replaced saphenous cut down procedures in critically ill children in emergency situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of IO infusion over peripheral vascular access is that it provides a rapid and reliable access to the systemic venous circulation in children [ 21 23 ]. It can be used in children of all ages, with the smallest child reported in literature weighing 800 g [ 24 ]. This has led to IO infusion having almost completely replaced saphenous cut down procedures in critically ill children in emergency situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally considered to be a safe technique with a reported complication rate of 1% [ 26 ]. Several complications resulting from the use of IO infusion have been reported; these consisted of extravasation in some cases leading to compartment syndrome (in rare cases leading to limb amputation), osteomyelitis, fracture, skin necrosis and fat embolism [ 24 , 27 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No RCTs have compared different routes of administration; however, simulation can be used to compare different methods of vascular access insertion. Case reports have shown intraosseous lines to be quick and effective (55)(56)(57) and simulation studies have shown that IO access is quicker than UVC insertion in both experienced and non-experienced health care professionals (53,58). However, at present the NRP prefer UVC placement to peripheral or IO access due to decreased risk of extravasation (14,59,60).…”
Section: Adrenaline/accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1980s, the technique was re-introduced in response to the need for immediate vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Currently, the technique is used throughout the United States and is recognized as an accepted alternative to intravenous (IV) access in pediatric emergencies and, increasingly, in neonatal and adult emergencies 35. In addition, the ease, effectiveness, and safety of the technique have led to its use for prehospital and combat emergency care 2,68.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%