Sir, Emerging evidence shows that patients with renal dysfunction or on haemodialysis treated with the conventional linezolid (LZD) dose (600 mg bid) have higher drug exposure and higher frequency of haematological toxicity compared with patients with normal renal function [1][2][3][4]. We here report the successful application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of LZD in a peritoneal dialysis (PD) patient who experienced drug-related severe thrombocytopoenia while treated with the conventional 600 mg bid LZD dose.A 66-year-old Caucasian man was admitted to the Nephrology Unit of our hospital on January 17, 2014 with a diagnosis of lumbar spondylodiscitis accompanied by iliopsoas abscesses. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium contrast (T2-weighted) performed a few days due to leg weakness and lower back pain persisting from about 1 month demonstrated vertebral osteomyelitis at the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae with intervening discitis and multiple abscesses in the iliopsoas. He had a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic renal insufficiency handled by automated PD in continuous cycled with Tidal (CCPD-17 l/die) since October 2012, and a high frequency of previous hospital admissions for septic complications. He received immediately empiric antibiotic therapy with intravenous vancomycin and gentamicin. Gentamicin was subsequently withdrawn after the blood culture performed at admission evidenced the presence of multiresistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infection. At discharge, vancomycin was replaced by oral LZD 600 mg bid (February 28, day 0). The patient was not given other concomitant drugs associated with haematologic toxicity (he was on maintenance therapy with doxazosin, epoetin beta, pantoprazole, allopurinol, calcitriol, atenolol, simvastatin and ezetimibe). As shown in Fig. 1, the patient experienced a progressive reduction in the blood platelet count, that reached a nadir of 53×10^3 cells/mL at day 30 after starting LZD treatment. A blood sample for TDM of LZD trough level drawn on day 23 retrieved a LZD concentration of 25.5 mg/ L (in our centre we considered as therapeutic range a concentration window of 2-10 mg/L [5]). After the result of the LZD assessment, the drug dose was reduced from 600 to 300 mg bid. An additional LZD trough concentration of 16.0 mg/L was measured the day after drug dose adjustment, just before the administration of the morning dose. On day 29, the patient was admitted to the emergency department due to severe episodes of epistaxis that were followed by a severe reduction in the haemoglobin levels (Fig. 1). With the reduced dose of