2013
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful treatment of refractory anti-signal recognition particle myopathy using abatacept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Musuruana and Cavallasca 5 reported a dramatic response from a patient receiving methotrexate and azathioprine combined with abatacept. In a case report, Maeshima et al 6 found abatacept to be effective in a patient that did not respond to any biological agents, including a TNF blocker and tocilizumab. Nevertheless, none of these studies administered abatacept in the form of a monotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, Musuruana and Cavallasca 5 reported a dramatic response from a patient receiving methotrexate and azathioprine combined with abatacept. In a case report, Maeshima et al 6 found abatacept to be effective in a patient that did not respond to any biological agents, including a TNF blocker and tocilizumab. Nevertheless, none of these studies administered abatacept in the form of a monotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the literature contains numerous studies (case studies and series of a small number of cases) concerning the use of abatacept in the treatment of PM, none of such studies employed this agent in the form of a monotherapy. [3][4][5][6] In this article, we present a case diagnosed with PM that did not sufficiently respond to neither biological agents, namely rituximab, nor pharmaceutical agents that were indicated for the conventional treatment of the disease and developed femoral head avascular necrosis because of the corticosteroid treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costimulatory molecules CD28 and CTLA‐4 are both upregulated in the muscle tissue of PM and DM patients suggesting that abatacept, an anti‐T cell biologic targeting CD80 and CD86 on antigen‐presenting cells, might be effective in myositis . This agent was effective in a refractory PM patient , a JDM patient with severe, ulcerative rash and calcinosis , and a patient with anti‐SRP‐positive severe PM . It was recently reported that a patient with severe myositis, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis and ILD refractory to several immunosuppressive agents and biologic therapies responded to abatacept .…”
Section: Biologic Agents In Myositismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abatacept use was associated with a favorable outcome in a report of refractory PM [52], while a recalcitrant JDM patient with ulcerative skin disease and progressive calcinosis also improved [53]. In another Japanese case report, abatacept was successful in the treatment of refractory anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP) myositis [54]. In a more recent report, a patient with severe myositis in overlap with rheumatoid arthritis, peripheral vasculitis, and interstitial lung disease, who had been refractory to many conventional and biologic therapies, responded well to abatacept with good control of the myositis [55].…”
Section: Abataceptmentioning
confidence: 99%