2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful treatment of end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with biventricular cardiac pacing

Abstract: The beneficial use of biventricular pacing is reported in a patient with end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, intraventricular conduction delay and echocardiographic evidence of intraventricular dyssyncrony. Marked improvement in clinical status, left ventricular ejection fraction and peak VO2 were observed. As far as we know, this is the first report of a beneficial effect of a biventricular device in this subset of patients, and may be worth further investigation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has a well‐established role in the treatment of patients with symptomatic heart failure, lowered ejection fraction of the left ventricle, and signs of abnormal intraventricular electrical conduction. Only two case reports show effectiveness of CRT in adult patients with HCM, expressed as reduction of intraventricular pressure gradient in a patient with obstructive form of disease 2 or as improvement in clinical status and performance of the left ventricle in the case of end‐stage cardiomyopathy 3 . Both patients presented with significant ventricular dyssynchrony at baseline and the authors attributed the effect of pacing to the restoration of electrical and mechanical synchrony of ventricles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has a well‐established role in the treatment of patients with symptomatic heart failure, lowered ejection fraction of the left ventricle, and signs of abnormal intraventricular electrical conduction. Only two case reports show effectiveness of CRT in adult patients with HCM, expressed as reduction of intraventricular pressure gradient in a patient with obstructive form of disease 2 or as improvement in clinical status and performance of the left ventricle in the case of end‐stage cardiomyopathy 3 . Both patients presented with significant ventricular dyssynchrony at baseline and the authors attributed the effect of pacing to the restoration of electrical and mechanical synchrony of ventricles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BiV pacing is recommended for the treatment of heart failure in patients with reduced ejection fraction and electrocardiographic evidence of conduction delay [27]. This pilot study (and two recent case reports [28,29]) suggests that implantation of a BiV device is a useful adjunct to conventional heart failure therapy in patients with end‐stage HCM. As both LA dilatation [30] and the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony [11] have been shown to be associated with a worse prognosis in HCM, the significant improvements in ventricular and atrial dimensions seen in this study may confer important prognostic advantages including a reduction in stroke risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recently, biventricular pacing was reported to improve heart failure symptoms and reverse remodeling in end-stage HCM patients with LBBB in case reports and a series report. [ 28 29 30 ] In view of these findings, CRT is considered for HCM patients with refractory symptoms, LVEF <50%, and LBBB in the newly enacted European Society of Cardiology guideline (Class IIb, level C). [ 31 ] In addition, our study showed that the risk of mortality of mild systolic dysfunction was equal to that of severe systolic dysfunction by echocardiography, which strengthened the importance of early CRT management, even in mild systolic dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%