2003
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful strategic change: some managerial guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the context of continuous environmental changes, strategic change is not an option but is essential for contemporary organizations (Hamel and Prahalad, 1994;Beaver, 2003). How adept organizations are in implementing strategic change is a key differentiating factor and a source of competitive advantage.…”
Section: Leadership Capability Strategic Change and Competitive Advamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the context of continuous environmental changes, strategic change is not an option but is essential for contemporary organizations (Hamel and Prahalad, 1994;Beaver, 2003). How adept organizations are in implementing strategic change is a key differentiating factor and a source of competitive advantage.…”
Section: Leadership Capability Strategic Change and Competitive Advamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further elaborated upon later in the paper. Our review of the relevant literature reveals that there is much published research ranging in scope from anecdotal descriptions of both successful and unsuccessful attempts at implementing strategic change within organizations to the more normative contributions replete with their blanket prescriptions and "how to implement" formulae for those organizations contemplating the need to implement major organizational strategic change (for typical examples, see Atherton, 1993;Beaver, 2003;Jackson, 2005;Khan, 2006;Mento et al, 2002). Our review identifies three key streams around which the literature has developed.…”
Section: Implementing Major Strategic Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance is usual in change (Hackman, 1999;Mento et al, 2002;Beaver, 2003;Atkinson, 2005) and often there are partially or even totally unintended impacts of change initiative that must be addressed (Palmer and Dunford, 2002). However, for FSR with this combination of dynamics, resistance was likely to be stronger.…”
Section: Challenges For Engaging the Customermentioning
confidence: 99%