1989
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198901000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful Retreatment of Allograft Rejection With Okt3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that the majority of patients (>70%) with low antibody titres measured by ELISA experienced rever sal of rejection after muromonab CD3 re-treatment. [245][246][247] Howe ver, the ELISA method does not distingui sh between anti-idiotype and anti-i sotyp e antibodies, is difficult to standardise, and is cumbersome to perform on small numbers of samples.l21 9.222] Other assays, such as the immunofluorescence inhibition test, [244] flow cytometry, [248] and a new membrane-based Irnmunoassay.t-t" aim to improve the selective detection of anti-idiotypic antibodies and maintain ease of performance. The membranebased immunoassay was compared with the ELISA: the result s for the 2 methods correlated well, [249] although the only strong advantage of the membrane-based method over the ELISA was the rapid turnaround time of 15 minute s for the former.…”
Section: Anti-muromonab Cd3 Antibody Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that the majority of patients (>70%) with low antibody titres measured by ELISA experienced rever sal of rejection after muromonab CD3 re-treatment. [245][246][247] Howe ver, the ELISA method does not distingui sh between anti-idiotype and anti-i sotyp e antibodies, is difficult to standardise, and is cumbersome to perform on small numbers of samples.l21 9.222] Other assays, such as the immunofluorescence inhibition test, [244] flow cytometry, [248] and a new membrane-based Irnmunoassay.t-t" aim to improve the selective detection of anti-idiotypic antibodies and maintain ease of performance. The membranebased immunoassay was compared with the ELISA: the result s for the 2 methods correlated well, [249] although the only strong advantage of the membrane-based method over the ELISA was the rapid turnaround time of 15 minute s for the former.…”
Section: Anti-muromonab Cd3 Antibody Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oFBMAb 1H5 described in this paper begins to inhibit complement activation at concentrations as low as 1 ,ug/ml. This level is clinically achievable, as it is similar to the concentrations of mouse IgG in serum seen with the antirejection drug OKT3 (16). A potential limiting factor in the treatment of humans with any mouse IgG would be the presence of preformed human antibodies to mouse IgG, which would prevent the development of any therapeutic concentration in serum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The rate of infection and the incidence of lymphoproliferative disorder are noted to be even higher after repeated application of antilymphocytic agents (23–26). Development of human antihorse or human antimouse antibodies against ALG or OKT3 further limits repeated courses of antilymphocyte induction therapy (27, 28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%