1978
DOI: 10.1136/adc.53.7.580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful restoration of immunity in the DiGeorge syndrome with fetal thymic epithelial transplant.

Abstract: SUMMARY A 13-month-old girl presented with right upper lobe pneumonia and hypocalcaemic seizures: investigations showed hypoparathyroidism and impaired cell-mediated immune responses. Other features of the DiGeorge syndrome included hypertelorism, short philtrum of the lip, rightsided aortic arch, and aberrant origin of the left subclavian artery. Successful restoration of the immunodeficiency was achieved by transplantation of fetal thymic epithelium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before positive selection had arrived on the scene, Miller and Mitchel did their classic experiments showing that T cells were required for the production of antibody using T and B cells from different strains of mice (Miller & Mitchel 1968)! And in the meantime, surgeons were curing Di George patients with allogeneic fetal thymus epitheiium grafts, blithly ignoring the vast majority of immunologists who would predict that it cannot work (Thong et al 1978). So, given that the two theoretical frameworks exist, that neither is perfect, and that both seem to generate ideas and experiments, is there any clear way to distinguish between them?…”
Section: Epilogue: An Experimental Oeeeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before positive selection had arrived on the scene, Miller and Mitchel did their classic experiments showing that T cells were required for the production of antibody using T and B cells from different strains of mice (Miller & Mitchel 1968)! And in the meantime, surgeons were curing Di George patients with allogeneic fetal thymus epitheiium grafts, blithly ignoring the vast majority of immunologists who would predict that it cannot work (Thong et al 1978). So, given that the two theoretical frameworks exist, that neither is perfect, and that both seem to generate ideas and experiments, is there any clear way to distinguish between them?…”
Section: Epilogue: An Experimental Oeeeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings correlate with clinical observa tions of increased susceptibility to infection in general [19], and the higher morbidity and mortality with res piratory syncytial viral infections in particular [18], Our own clinical experience shows that, overall, al most half of the patients enter hospital for infections, and that the conotruncal group, which is more immunodeficient than the shunt group, has a cor respondingly higher prevalence of infections. These findings indicate that immunological assessment should be considered for children with congenital heart disease, especially those with conotruncal malformations, since T cell immunodeficiencies are amenable to therapy with thymic-epithelial trans plantation [22,23], or thymic-hormone therapy [24], and immunoglobulin deficiencies are amenable to gammaglobulin supplementation [25],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Therapies for the immunodeficient type of this syndrome have been fetal thymus transplantation, thymic hormone administration and bone marrow transplantation (BMT). For thymic transplantation, it is necessary to use fetal thymic tissue 3 or to use cultured thymic epithelial tissue, since it is not as easy to get donor cells. For thymic hormones such as thymosin, thymopoietin and thymulin, it is unclear what nature of thymic hormones should be used and over what time period, results have varied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%