Successful recovery following musculoskeletal trauma: protocol for a qualitative study of patients’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions

Abstract

Background Annually in the UK, 40,000–90,000 people are involved in a traumatic incident. Severity of injury and how well people recover from their injuries varies, with physiotherapy playing a key role in the rehabilitation process. Recovery is evaluated using multiple outcome measures for perceived levels of pain severity and quality of life. It is unclear however, what constitutes a successful recovery from injury throughout the course of recovery from the patient perspective, and whether this aligns with physiotherapists’ perspectives. Methods A qualitative study using two approaches: Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis following the Kreuger framework for focus groups. A purposive sample of 20 patients who have experienced musculoskeletal trauma within the past 4 weeks and 12 physiotherapists who manage this patient population will be recruited from a single trauma centre in the UK. Semi-structured interviews with patients at 4 weeks, 6 and 12 months following injury, and 2 focus groups with physiotherapists will be undertaken at one time point. Views and perceptions on the definition of recovery and what constitutes a successful recovery will be explored using both methods, with a focus on the lived experience and patient journey following musculoskeletal trauma, and how this changes through the process of recovery. Data from both the semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be analysed separately and then integrated and synthesised into key themes ensuring similarities and differences are identified. Strategies to ensure trustworthiness e.g., reflexivity will be employed. Discussion Recovery following musculoskeletal trauma is complex and understanding of the concept of successful recovery and how this changes over time following an injury is largely unknown. It is imperative to understand the patient perspective and whether these perceptions align with current views of physiotherapists. A greater understanding of recovery following musculoskeletal trauma has potential to change clinical care, optimise patient centred care and improve efficiency and clinical decision making during rehabilitation. This in turn can contribute to improved clinical effectiveness, patient outcome and patient satisfaction with potential service and economic cost savings. This study has ethical approval (IRAS 287781/REC 20/PR/0712).

“The Running Injury Continuum: A qualitative examination of recreational runners’ description and management of injury”

“…Constant comparative analysis took place, beginning after transcription of the first focus group and continued throughout data collection (47). A similar sample size has been used in previous research and allowed for the collection of a rich description from participants regarding RRIs (48,49).…”

Rehabilitation outcomes based on service provision and geographical location for patients with multiple trauma: A mixed-method systematic review

“…In addition to expected research from the Netherlands [56], recommendations for future research is currently being addressed by two further study protocols [61,62]. Soberg et al [61] aims to quantitatively and prospectively investigate rehabilitation needs, services and functional outcomes in geographical regions with cost consideration to target future rehabilitation provision [61].…”

“…Soberg et al [61] aims to quantitatively and prospectively investigate rehabilitation needs, services and functional outcomes in geographical regions with cost consideration to target future rehabilitation provision [61]. Conducting semi-structured interviews and focus groups, Middlebrook et al [62] aims to explore views and perceptions of successful recovery. Once completed and published these studies could provide much needed research into rehabilitation geographical variation and show the areas for development to meet NICE guidelines [20].…”

Patient and public involvement in rheumatic and musculoskeletal research: an idea whose time has firmly come

“…Teo et al [ 11 ] shared factors affecting patient engagement in exercise rehabilitation, noting that exercise programs are best co-designed between patients and exercise specialists with individual consideration of engagement factors to optimize participation and outcomes. Middlebrook et al [ 12 ] delved further into improving musculoskeletal trauma recovery outcomes by evaluating patients' and physiotherapists' successful recovery perceptions to ensure alignment. Salmasi et al [ 13 ] reported on researchers' perspectives in an OMERACT adherence study, while Cornelissen et al [ 14 ] shared a co-designed multi-component adherence protocol for osteoporosis care.…”