1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(18)32591-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful passive transfer of resistance to Fasciola hepatica infection in rats by immune serum and transfer factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protection of naive rats by intraperitoneal injection of sera from F. hepatica ‐infected sheep, cattle or rats suggests a killing mechanism at that site dependent on the presence of parasite‐specific antibody (20–25). The protective response in these studies required challenge infection on the day of transfer with killing of NEJ liver fluke occurring within 48 h, prior to entry into the liver (20–23) and therefore is likely to involve resident PLCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The protection of naive rats by intraperitoneal injection of sera from F. hepatica ‐infected sheep, cattle or rats suggests a killing mechanism at that site dependent on the presence of parasite‐specific antibody (20–25). The protective response in these studies required challenge infection on the day of transfer with killing of NEJ liver fluke occurring within 48 h, prior to entry into the liver (20–23) and therefore is likely to involve resident PLCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Monocytes/macrophages have not been specifically studied in the killing of NEJ liver fluke but are one of the major effector cells involved in the killing of parasites by the production of free radicals (16–19). Resident peritoneal lavage cells (PLCs) of naive rats are a source rich in monocytes/macrophages and passive transfer of sera from F. hepatica ‐infected sheep, cattle or rats protect naive rats from F. hepatica infection when injected intraperitoneally (20–25). Most juvenile parasites are killed within the gut and peritoneum before reaching the liver, suggesting that resident PLCs such as monocytes/macrophages could be involved in the killing of NEJ liver fluke by a mechanism dependent on parasite‐specific antibody (2,20–23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peritoneal exudate cells were found to transfer resistance in mice (Lang et al 1967); spleen and lymph node cells from infected animals were shown to confer resistance in rats and cattle (Corba et al 1971) as well a s in sheep (Armour & Dargie 1974). Mitchell et al (1981) also demonstrated that transfer factor could transfer resistance between infected and uninfected rats, but not between cattle. However, all of these transfer studies are critically dependent o n the time when the cells used for transfer are taken after infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In an investigation of the competence of lymphocytes obtained from immune and non-immune donors to cause expulsion of Nippostrongvhts braziliensis in the rat, DINEEN et al (1973) record the failure of lymphocytes from non-immune donors given intravenously to cause expulsion while KELLER & KEIST (1972) report expulsion with similar non-immune donor lymphocytes given intraperitoneally. Evidence of reduced infections were also obtained by MITCHELL et al (1981) following intraperitoneal administration of normal sera in rats to infection with Fasciola hepatica and it is therefore possible that the intraperitoneal route of administration favours a non-specific immune sequel although there are many examples in the literature of material given intraperitoneally producing no resistance to various types of challenge infection (KLESIUS & FUDENM-RG, 1977;KLESIUS et al, 1978;LARSH et al, 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%