1992
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90208-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful pain management by Finnish oral surgeons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical removal of wisdom teeth under local anaesthesia is widely carried out in general dental practice and in many institutional surgery clinics, occupying an appreciable amount of clinical time [ 1 , 2 ]. This procedure is usually associated with postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus [ 1 - 4 ] as direct and immediate consequences of the surgical procedure [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical removal of wisdom teeth under local anaesthesia is widely carried out in general dental practice and in many institutional surgery clinics, occupying an appreciable amount of clinical time [ 1 , 2 ]. This procedure is usually associated with postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus [ 1 - 4 ] as direct and immediate consequences of the surgical procedure [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies investigating the removal of the third molar, pain assessment is commonly used by clinicians as an index of treatment success, on the basis that patients use pain as a cue for treatment outcomes. A variety of pain rating scales are used to assess patients' pain outcomes (7)(8)(9)(10). The visual analogue scale (VAS) is most commonly used to assess pain intensity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual analogue scale (VAS) is most commonly used to assess pain intensity. A treatment is defined as successful when patients report postoperative pain that is significantly less than baseline measures or control group measures (7)(8)(9)(10). Alternatively, several authors define a pain reduction of 30% to 50% as successful (11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] This rating is mostly used as the primary outcome measure, but multiple ratings will lower patient compliance. A single pain rating would therefore be more practical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these studies a multiple pain rating is used as the primary pain outcome. [1][2][3][4] In the assessment of pain, pain reports tend to change over time, even during the course of a day. 5,6 Jensen et al 6,7 have shown that in patients with chronic pain a single pain intensity rating was the least reliable, whereas three pain intensity measurements a day over the course of 4 days showed excellent internal consistency and validity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%