2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-019-01907-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful intra-class switching among IL-17 antagonists: a multicentre, multinational, retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is less compared to three other retrospective studies in which patients receiving ixekizumab as second IL17A-blocker reached a PASI 75 response at week 12 in 71% [5], 81% [4], or even 100% [3]. In another retrospective study, 50% PASI 75 response at week 12 to ixekizumab as second IL17Ablocker was comparable to our study [8]. Until now, to our knowledge, only one study reported PASI 75 responses after 24 weeks of ixekizumab as second IL17A-blocker, which were reached by a higher proportion of patients (80%), compared to 42.1% in our study [4].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…This is less compared to three other retrospective studies in which patients receiving ixekizumab as second IL17A-blocker reached a PASI 75 response at week 12 in 71% [5], 81% [4], or even 100% [3]. In another retrospective study, 50% PASI 75 response at week 12 to ixekizumab as second IL17Ablocker was comparable to our study [8]. Until now, to our knowledge, only one study reported PASI 75 responses after 24 weeks of ixekizumab as second IL17A-blocker, which were reached by a higher proportion of patients (80%), compared to 42.1% in our study [4].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Of note, there were a substantial number of intraclass switches in anti‐IL‐17 drug from secukinumab to ixekizumab, as well as a number of switches to a new class of anti‐IL‐23‐p19 antibodies (guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab) (Table S13). However, intraclass switching in IL‐17 inhibitors is not uncommon, as it may restore clinical efficacy 33 . Overall, the rate at which a previously administered drug was restarted (after an interval of at least 12 weeks after the regularly scheduled administration as defined in the methods) ranged from 2·6% to 19·0% for etanercept, adalimumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab and ixekizumab (Table S13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 59 Some of these non-responder patients can be successfully switched between IL-17A inhibitors – perhaps as a consequence of reinduction – but others become resistant. 60 The broader blockade of brodalumab may account for its high efficacy and speed of response, but quick relapses have been reported on treatment discontinuation; increased levels of active IL-17 cytokines on blockade of their common receptor subunit IL-17RA might provide a mechanistic explanation. 61 Dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F represents a novel approach that has proved to be effective in multiple models of disease, in both preclinical and clinical studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%