2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2019.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful implementation of a totally leadless biventricular pacing approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another case was reported by Funasako et al . 11 the same year. More patients have been implanted with these two systems since then.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Another case was reported by Funasako et al . 11 the same year. More patients have been implanted with these two systems since then.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, innovations have been made toward creating a totally leadless CRT system incorporating the WiSE-CRT TM and Micra TM TPS devices, which was described in two published case reports [69, 70]. The implantation procedure for each device is similar to previously described, as both devices are implanted individually.…”
Section: Leadless Cardiac Resynchronization Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current limitations in CRT related to vein morphology and SEAT could be overcome with recent developments of leadless LV pacemaker systems (60)(61)(62). Leadless systems generally have the advantage of nullifying the risk of lead failure and thrombo-fibrotic lead encapsulations (TFLE) or lead infections by minimizing implant size and implant-tissue interface equally.…”
Section: Leadless Pacing In Crtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although leadless biventricular pacing has been shown to be feasible and effective (61,62), it is limited to patients without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) since endocardial defibrillation has (currently) no leadless alternative. CRT-D patients, however, constitute ∼70% of all CRT patients and still rely on a subcutaneous pulse generator and transvenous leads.…”
Section: Leadless Pacing In Crtmentioning
confidence: 99%