2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator implantation through a communicating branch of the persistent left superior vena cava

Abstract: A left pectoral dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was successfully implanted through a small branch communicating between a persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) and right-sided venous drainage with long sheaths. Postprocedural computed tomography identified the communicating branch. ICD lead implantation through a PLSVC is challenging and sometimes unsuccessful. This case illustrates an alternative approach for ICD lead implantation in patients with a PLSVC. A PLSVC system should … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transvenous leads entering the RA via the PLSVC and CS are directed posteriorly away from the tricuspid annulus, making it difficult to direct a lead across the TV annulus into the RV. There are several approaches that can be utilized for left-sided RV lead placement: (1) implantation via the communicating vein, 5 , 6 which was absent in our case; (2) use of J-tipped or manually shaped stylets with large curves, 3 , 9 although this technique can be particularly challenging with ICD leads compared to pacemaker leads and was unsuccessful in this particular case; and (3) use of a CS delivery sheath, which can be used to direct leads toward the RV. 10 , 11 While CS delivery sheaths from most vendors can be used for pacemaker lead implantation, larger-diameter sheaths for ICDs are not routinely available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transvenous leads entering the RA via the PLSVC and CS are directed posteriorly away from the tricuspid annulus, making it difficult to direct a lead across the TV annulus into the RV. There are several approaches that can be utilized for left-sided RV lead placement: (1) implantation via the communicating vein, 5 , 6 which was absent in our case; (2) use of J-tipped or manually shaped stylets with large curves, 3 , 9 although this technique can be particularly challenging with ICD leads compared to pacemaker leads and was unsuccessful in this particular case; and (3) use of a CS delivery sheath, which can be used to direct leads toward the RV. 10 , 11 While CS delivery sheaths from most vendors can be used for pacemaker lead implantation, larger-diameter sheaths for ICDs are not routinely available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Previously reported techniques for delivering left-sided leads into the right ventricle (RV) involved specially curved stylets or use of a communicating branch of the PLSVC. 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 As opposed to pacemaker leads, stylets are not as effective for redirecting ICD leads from the CS ostium toward the tricuspid annulus. In the absence of a communicating vein between the right-sided superior vena cava and PLSVC, right-sided implant may be required that is associated with higher defibrillation threshold (DFT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this patient may need an upgrade from an ICD to a cardiac resynchronization therapy device in the near future because of the presence of cardiomyopathy, but a left ventricular (LV) lead implantation via a PLSVC seems difficult. A recent paper has demonstrated both successful ICD [12] and LV [13] , [14] lead implantation through a small branch communicating between a PLSVC and the right-sided venous drainage. However, as in our case, the PLSVC and right superior vena cava are not connected by a communicating branch in 40% of cases ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLSVC is a vascular anomaly and can be incidentally detected during right heart invasive procedures. However, PLSVC may cause technical difficulties during cardiac device implantation ( 2 ). The presence of a dilated CS should alter the medical team to the possibility of a PLSVC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%