2006
DOI: 10.2175/193864706783710802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful Evaulation of Ten IFAS and MMBR Facilities by applying the Unified Model to Quantify Biofilm Surface Area Requirements for Nitrificaiton, Determine its Accuracy in Prediciting Effluent Characteristics, and understand the Contribution of Media towards Organics Removal and Nitrification

Abstract: The performance of ten full scale wastewater treatment facilities applying IFAS and MBBR systems was evaluated using the Unified Model for Activated Sludge, IFAS and MBBR systems. At each facility, the model was applied to compute the biofilm surface area required to achieve nitrification based on the plant loading, mixed liquor temperature and aerobic mixed liquor MCRT. The effluent ammonium-N was then computed for the amount of biofilm surface area installed and compared to the plant effluent. The analysis s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier versions of the IFAS model were published by Sen and Randall (1996 , 2005 ) and by Sriwiriyarat et al (2005) . Several full‐scale IFAS and MBBR facilities were evaluated using the model, and the results were published in 2006 ( Sen et al, 2006 ). The facilities included Broomfield, Colorado ( Rutt et al, 2006 ); Annapolis, Maryland ( Copithorn et al, 2006 ); Geisselbullach, Germany ( Lessel, 1994 ); Mamaroneck, New York ( Psaltakis et al, 2003 ); and Providence, Rhode Island ( Masterson et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier versions of the IFAS model were published by Sen and Randall (1996 , 2005 ) and by Sriwiriyarat et al (2005) . Several full‐scale IFAS and MBBR facilities were evaluated using the model, and the results were published in 2006 ( Sen et al, 2006 ). The facilities included Broomfield, Colorado ( Rutt et al, 2006 ); Annapolis, Maryland ( Copithorn et al, 2006 ); Geisselbullach, Germany ( Lessel, 1994 ); Mamaroneck, New York ( Psaltakis et al, 2003 ); and Providence, Rhode Island ( Masterson et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of values of coefficients have been developed for use in the model (Table 1). These values are derived by calibrating the model to the data from the continuous‐flow pilot studies ( Sriwiryarat et al, 2005 ) and calibration of the model to several full‐scale MBBRs and IFAS plants ( Sen et al, 2006 ). In and 15, the half‐saturation constants K hydr,EA,PorgN,SS and K hydr,EA,PorgN,SS are 1 mg/L for all electron acceptor (EA) conditions.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%