2016
DOI: 10.1177/1039856216656537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful evaluation of cognitive function and the nature of cognitive deficits among people with schizophrenia in clinical rehabilitation settings

Abstract: The study indicates that evaluation of cognitive function using brief instruments is feasible in psychiatric rehabilitation settings. Global and domain-specific CD were prevalent among people with schizophrenia. In view of the strong association of cognitive functioning with community functioning and rehabilitation outcomes, further studies exploring the feasibility and utility of routinely evaluating cognitive function are warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated cognitive function using a standardized instrument, which measures various domains of cognition affected in people with schizophrenia. Although the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is considered to be the gold standard for evaluation of cognitive function in schizophrenia (Kern et al, 2008; Nuechterlein et al, 2008), in ordinary clinical practice, brief assessments of cognitive functions are often more feasible and are as reliable and valid as lengthy neuropsychological tests (Fervaha et al, 2015; John et al, 2016; Keefe et al, 2004, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We evaluated cognitive function using a standardized instrument, which measures various domains of cognition affected in people with schizophrenia. Although the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is considered to be the gold standard for evaluation of cognitive function in schizophrenia (Kern et al, 2008; Nuechterlein et al, 2008), in ordinary clinical practice, brief assessments of cognitive functions are often more feasible and are as reliable and valid as lengthy neuropsychological tests (Fervaha et al, 2015; John et al, 2016; Keefe et al, 2004, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS; Keefe et al, 2004Keefe et al, , 2008 was used to evaluate cognitive functioning. This paper-and-pencil cognitive assessment instrument, which takes approximately 35 min to administer, has sound psychometric properties (Keefe et al, 2008) and is feasible to be administered in clinical rehabilitation settings (John, Yeak, Ayres, Sevastos, & Moore, 2016). The six subtests of the BACS include verbal memory (VM) digit sequencing (DS), token motor task (TMT), verbal fluency (VF), symbol coding (SC), and Tower of London (ToL).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a systematic review conducted in 2014 [ 105 ], the MCCB was the instrument adopted in most trials ( N = 69), followed by the BACS ( N = 24). In addition, the BACS has proven to be a feasible tool in a clinical rehabilitation setting [ 147 ]; however, more research is advisable. BNA and B-CATS were not used in any clinical trial.…”
Section: Instruments Developed For Assessing Neurocognitive Impairmen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Значительное количество работ, посвященных поискам коррелятов СФ пациентов, сосредоточено вокруг оценки нейрокогнитивного дефицита. В таких исследованиях было установлено, что позитивные симптомы шизофрении не связаны с когнитивным дефицитом [36], однако, были обнаружены существенные связи между негативными симптомами и дефицитом памяти, беглостью речи, исполнительными функциями и скоростью обработки информации [21]. На данный момент общепринятой является точка зрения, согласно которой дефицит когнитивного функционирования при шизофрении носит преимущественно генерализованный, гетерогенный характер, однако, наибольшая его выраженность проявляется в следующем ряде функций: эпизодическая память; скорость обработки информации; вербальная беглость; внимание; исполнительные функции; рабочая память [37; 2].…”
unclassified