2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3811-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children depends on age and etiology of hydrocephalus: outcome analysis in 51 pediatric patients

Abstract: Factors indicating a potential failure of ETV were young age and etiology such as spina bifida, other than isolated aqueductal stenosis. ETV is the method of choice even in patients with former shunting. Fast healing, distensible skulls, and lower pressure gradient in younger children, all can play a role in ETV failure. Based on our experience, ETV could be the first method of choice for hydrocephalus even in children younger than 6 months of age.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shunt infection need not be considered a contraindication for ETV even though the success rate might be slightly lower in such cases [24]. Secondary ETV success rates in pediatric case series reported in the literature range from 60 to 80% [14, 16, 25-27] which matches with the success rate of 73.5% in our case series. Marton et al [25] studied 22 children in 2010 who underwent ETV for shunt malfunction and found no significant correlation between ETV failure and patient age or etiology of hydrocephalus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shunt infection need not be considered a contraindication for ETV even though the success rate might be slightly lower in such cases [24]. Secondary ETV success rates in pediatric case series reported in the literature range from 60 to 80% [14, 16, 25-27] which matches with the success rate of 73.5% in our case series. Marton et al [25] studied 22 children in 2010 who underwent ETV for shunt malfunction and found no significant correlation between ETV failure and patient age or etiology of hydrocephalus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Marton et al [25] studied 22 children in 2010 who underwent ETV for shunt malfunction and found no significant correlation between ETV failure and patient age or etiology of hydrocephalus. Zhao et al [26] found a history of preterm birth and age <6 months at initial shunt insertion to be a negative predictor of success while Duru et al [27] reported etiology other than isolated aqueductal stenosis to be a negative predictor of success for secondary ETV. Secondary ETV has been found to be effective in close to 100% of cases of following hemorrhagic hydrocephalus as against 61% of cases with primary ETV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duru et al [20] reported their experience with ETV in 51 children below 16 years of age; they reported an overall success rate of 80% (40/51) for all etiologies and ages. In patients < 6 months of age, the success rate was 56.2% (9/16), while 6-24 months of age was 88.9% (16/18) and > 24 months was 94.1% (16/17).…”
Section: Etv Success In Children Below 2 Years Of Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher success rates, reaching 90%, in some studies have been reported in infants with aqueductal stenosis [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Lower success rates were reported in patients with postinfectious and post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), and also with prior ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt failures [13,14,[17][18][19][20]. Infants have a lower success chance according to Kulkarni et al [21] suggested score of ETV success considering the age factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specifics of the revisions performed were not included in the database, so whether revisions being shunt insertion, shunt explantation, or re-ETV are unknown. Studies into survival rates have shown better ETV survival in young infants (< 6 months of age) with aquaduct stenosis, and worse survival rates in children with MMC, hemorrhage or infection, and different success rates of re-ETVor shunt placement [24][25][26]. These data, not included in our study, should be reported in future studies to compare success rate of surgery and outcome data of our surgical experience with other databases [19,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%