2011
DOI: 10.1080/10796126.2011.539198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful community engagement: Laying the foundation for effective teen pregnancy prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Level of CE achieved was moderate in 15 studies (63%), out of which eight studies used CBPR ( 3 , 24 , 60 62 , 67 , 70 , 71 ), two studies used the CHW model ( 59 , 63 ), and the remaining five studies used one of the following models: the FOCUS model ( 72 ), ANGELO model ( 73 ), the community empowerment model ( 66 ), the participatory action cycle ( 65 ), and CPPR ( 4 ). The level of CE achieved was good in six studies (25%), four of which used CBPR ( 18 , 68 , 69 , 74 ), one used CPPR ( 75 ), and one used the CDC model ( 64 ).Three studies (12%) that used the community action cycle ( 76 ), youth development model ( 77 ), and Well London model ( 78 ) showed poor levels of CE, where the community was only informed or consulted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Level of CE achieved was moderate in 15 studies (63%), out of which eight studies used CBPR ( 3 , 24 , 60 62 , 67 , 70 , 71 ), two studies used the CHW model ( 59 , 63 ), and the remaining five studies used one of the following models: the FOCUS model ( 72 ), ANGELO model ( 73 ), the community empowerment model ( 66 ), the participatory action cycle ( 65 ), and CPPR ( 4 ). The level of CE achieved was good in six studies (25%), four of which used CBPR ( 18 , 68 , 69 , 74 ), one used CPPR ( 75 ), and one used the CDC model ( 64 ).Three studies (12%) that used the community action cycle ( 76 ), youth development model ( 77 ), and Well London model ( 78 ) showed poor levels of CE, where the community was only informed or consulted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of involvement of engagees in the research project was good in 17 studies (71%), out of which 12 were CBPR studies ( 3 , 18 , 24 , 60 62 , 67 71 , 74 ), two were CPPR studies ( 4 , 75 ), and three studies used the community empowerment model ( 66 ), the CDC model ( 64 ), and the CHW model ( 59 ). Four studies (17%) that used the FOCUS model ( 72 ), participatory action cycle ( 65 ), the ANGELO model ( 73 ), and the community action cycle ( 76 ) showed moderate community involvement, while three studies (12%) that used the CHW model ( 63 ), the Well London model ( 78 ), and the youth development model ( 77 ) showed poor community involvement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The efforts of the community TPP coalition and Prevent Child Abuse created a community environment that was primed because of their previous work in addressing TPP, their existing coordination, and the synergy that was created between their efforts and the school district CHE-AC committees. This work builds on previous research that has documented the crucial role of community organizations and partnerships in TPP work, as well as approaches to building and maintain community engagement (Fisher et al, 2012;Goldberg, Frank, Bekenstein, Garrity, & Ruiz, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%