2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11420-016-9530-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful Arthroscopic Primary Repair of a Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear 11 Years Following Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable tool that allows the anatomical integrity of the ACL to be assessed by visualizing the entire anatomy from femoral origin to tibial insertion [17]. Multiple previous studies have evaluated the role of postoperative MRI after ACL reconstruction both after bone-patellar tendon bone (BPTB) and hamstrings grafts [14,17]. However, the graft maturation process is a distinctly different biological situation than the healing of the native ACL that has been repaired, and thus it is felt that the relevance to primary ACL repair is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable tool that allows the anatomical integrity of the ACL to be assessed by visualizing the entire anatomy from femoral origin to tibial insertion [17]. Multiple previous studies have evaluated the role of postoperative MRI after ACL reconstruction both after bone-patellar tendon bone (BPTB) and hamstrings grafts [14,17]. However, the graft maturation process is a distinctly different biological situation than the healing of the native ACL that has been repaired, and thus it is felt that the relevance to primary ACL repair is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last several years, some studies on ACL repair have shown good to excellent results with a failure rate ranging from 7% to 15% of cases [9][10][11][12][13]. Most articles recommend surgery within 4 weeks from injury; however, there is a wide variety of delay until treatment, including at least one case report of a patient treated 11 years after injury [14]. Since the renewal of interest in ACL primary repair has only been recent, there has been little investigation regarding MRI evaluation after ACL primary repair [7,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider that using a suspensory button device for the femoral fixation instead of knotless suture anchors 14 may have the following advantages: (1) avoidance of any physical or biomechanical reaction at the bone–ACL fiber interface because of absence of fixation devices at the aperture, and (2) in the case of revision surgery, easy removal of the hardware from both the tibial and femoral sides with a minimally invasive approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly seen in the subacute phase (i.e., between 2 weeks and 3 months 7 , 8 , 12 ) when the surgery is carried out but is also seen in chronic ACL ruptures if the ACL is scarred to the posterior cruciate ligament. 14 …”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions are usually seen in the acute phase (i.e. first 3 months 4 , 5 , 6 ), but can be seen in the chronic setting if the ACL is reattached to the posterior cruciate ligament 8 ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%