Temporary Anchorage Devices in Clinical Orthodontics 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119513636.ch68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success with TADs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the evaluation of this topic, 60 articles were found, 15 of which were selected for having the highest level of scientific evidence. The success of miniscrews is based on the anchorage achieved to perform the treatment while failure is considered when miniscrews show movement, fall out or need to be removed 41 . To avoid complications, it is important to have good knowledge of the methodology and the most adequate site of insertion of the miniscrew.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the evaluation of this topic, 60 articles were found, 15 of which were selected for having the highest level of scientific evidence. The success of miniscrews is based on the anchorage achieved to perform the treatment while failure is considered when miniscrews show movement, fall out or need to be removed 41 . To avoid complications, it is important to have good knowledge of the methodology and the most adequate site of insertion of the miniscrew.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of failure may be related to poor analysis of the insertion site, poor choice of equipment, poor treatment protocol, poor knowledge of orthodontic mechanics, or operator inexperience, and may also be related to infection by bacteria due to lack of adequate hygiene management. The absence of keratinized gingiva around the miniscrews increases the risk of inflammation, infection and failure 41 , 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 1 Because skeletal anchorage can avoid undesirable tooth movements, it has largely replaced conventional anchorage options and broadened the scope of nonsurgical orthodontic treatments. 2 As the most recent breakthrough in orthodontics, 3 skeletal anchorage have improved considerably since their introduction in 1945 by Gainsforth and Higley, 4 who suggested using implants as anchor device. In the following decades, pioneers conducted animal experiments with different materials and designs trying to find an appropriate and practical way clinically regarding skeletal anchorage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%