2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success, survive or escape? Aspirations and poverty traps

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen, Chang, and Bruton, 2017). This lends credence to the potential spillover effects of entrepreneurial activity based on high aspirations (Chivers, 2017). Furthermore, the evidence provided is consistent with the view that self-employment (at its early stages) may not be a suitable proxy for understanding entrepreneurial activity, especially that with more growth potential (Bruton, Ahlstrom, and Obloj, 2008;Haltiwanger, Jarmin, and Miranda, 2013).To our knowledge, our study is one of the first studies to take a deeper look at the complex relationship between inequality and entrepreneurial activity, and in conjunction with the relationship between entrepreneurial activity and absolute poverty alleviation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen, Chang, and Bruton, 2017). This lends credence to the potential spillover effects of entrepreneurial activity based on high aspirations (Chivers, 2017). Furthermore, the evidence provided is consistent with the view that self-employment (at its early stages) may not be a suitable proxy for understanding entrepreneurial activity, especially that with more growth potential (Bruton, Ahlstrom, and Obloj, 2008;Haltiwanger, Jarmin, and Miranda, 2013).To our knowledge, our study is one of the first studies to take a deeper look at the complex relationship between inequality and entrepreneurial activity, and in conjunction with the relationship between entrepreneurial activity and absolute poverty alleviation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Therefore, opportunity-centric entrepreneurs are able to establish a greater legitimacy to access complementary resources, which would increase the performance of their venture (Ahlstrom, Bruton, and Yeh, 2008). Furthermore, entrepreneurs with this sort of prior knowledge have higher aspirations (Chivers, 2017), and are more likely to strive for the betterment of self and society. Thus, they are also more likely to establish higher thresholds for their performance, meaning that they are less likely to tolerate lower performance after they establish their ventures (Gimeno, Folta, Cooper and Woo, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspiration is subordinate to the subjective well-being of the individual in a cognitive dimension and transcends material well-being [45][46][47]. However, the lack of aspiration will inhibit the formation of the individual's willingness to work [48,49] and will then affect the individual's economic decision-making and effort level [15,50]. The reduction of the individual's effort further strengthens the reduction of their aspiration, and the vicious circle formed thereby will cause the individual to fall into the trap of poverty [51].…”
Section: Background On Endogenous Impetus and Livelihood Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High poverty conditions also limit the level of aspirations (Dalton et al 2016). Wellknown conceptualizations such as poverty traps highlight the set of hindrances faced by individuals in developing aspirations for self-actualization (Chivers 2017). The collective resources of an area with a high poverty ratio may therefore not facilitate the mobilization of necessary resources and skills to adapt to changing conditions, nor provide the necessary psychological and socio-emotional resources to prime entrepreneurial activity (Schreiner 1999).…”
Section: Self-employment In Poor Neighbourhoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%