Success of Zygomatic Plate-Screw Anchorage System

Eroğlu, Tamer; Kaya, Burak; Çetinşahin, Alev; Arman, Ayça; Uçkan, Sina

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.132

Cited by 17 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[25][26][27][28][29] Miniplates have been shown to be well accepted as skeletal anchorage by both patients and providers and have turned out to be a safe and effective adjunct for complex orthodontic treatment. 24 However, the success rate of miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics [30][31][32][33] has not been investigated so thoroughly as that of miniscrews, and research has been limited to adolescent and adult patients. Compared with miniscrews and microscrews, miniplates showed greater stability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction

Clerck¹,

Swennen²

2011

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the success rate of Bollard miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP). Materials and Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients (mean age, 12.0 6 1.2 years; range, 8.7-14.8 years) with maxillary hypoplasia without congenital or acquired deformation were included in this study. A total of 100 Bollard modified miniplates were placed by the same surgeon. Ninety-nine miniplates were inserted under general anesthesia, and one was placed under local anesthesia because of initially soft bone conditions. Loading of the miniplates with 150 g elastics was initiated at 17.5 6 6.9 days (range, 11-38 days) after surgery. Mean follow-up was provided at 20.8 6 11.1 months (range, 6.5-46.2 months). Results: The overall success rate of miniplate anchorage in terms of stability was 97%. During orthodontic loading, five miniplates showed signs of mobility. After interruption of loading over 2 months, two miniplates became stable again. However, a total of three miniplates needed to be removed and were successfully replaced under local anesthesia after a mean healing period of 3 months. Conclusion: Skeletal anchorage by means of Bollard modified miniplates is effective for BAMP. Success depends on proper presurgical patient counseling, minimal invasive surgery, good postsurgical instructions, and orthodontic follow-up. (Angle Orthod. 2011;81:1010-1013

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction

Clerck¹,

Swennen²

2011

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, it should be inserted to the highest position on the zygomatic buttress to maintain a thicker bone. Manufacturing the zygoma plates in variable lengths may help to overcome these problems [6] or using modified miniplates as in our second case. In the first case the connecting bar emerged at mucogingival junction, was a key factor for good soft tissue management.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Currently 2 types of TSADs are used: screw implants and bone plates [9]. The zygoma anchorage system introduced by De Clerck et al was used for distalization of the teeth [6]. Different designs of miniplates are Bollard device that has either 2 (mandibular) or 3 (maxillary) fixation holes, a round connecting bar that perforates the mucosa, and an orthodontic attachment unit with a locking screw.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The location of miniplates, point of exposure to the oral cavity is absolutely critical [2,6]. A higher exposure point may lead to mucosal irritation, inflammation and hypertrophy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…More recently temporary skeletal anchorage device (TSAD), Miniplates and screws have been found to have advantage, including ease of manipulation, ability to withstand immediate force loading, minimal irritation of oral tissues and cost [1,4,5]. Anterior palate, buccal, or palatal interdental alveolar bone, and zygomaticomaxillary buttress are the anatomical regions in which the orthodontic implants are frequently placed [6]. However, miniplates should be placed by a surgeon because this is a technique sensitive surgery requiring flap elevation and strict asepsis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Orthopaedic Protraction of the Maxilla with Miniplates: Treatment of Midface Deficiency

Degala

Bhanumathi

Shivalinga

2013

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Class III malocclusion is a consequence of maxillary deficiency and/or mandibular prognathism, resulting in an anterior crossbite and a concave profile. Early class III malocclusion treatment with reverse pull headgear generally results in maxillary skeletal protraction but is frequently also accompanied by unfavourable dentoalveolar effects. Titanium miniplates used as temporary anchorage device might permit equivalent favourable skeletal changes without unwanted dentoalveolar effects. We report two cases having class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency treated by using titanium miniplates. Cephalometric tracings were done pre and post treatment to determine the anatomic changes during the course of treatment.

show abstract

The Logistics of Orthodontic Treatment for Impacted Teeth

Becker¹

2022

Orthodontic Treatment of Impacted Teeth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Success of Zygomatic Plate-Screw Anchorage System

Cited by 17 publications

References 8 publications

Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction

Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction

Orthopaedic Protraction of the Maxilla with Miniplates: Treatment of Midface Deficiency

The Logistics of Orthodontic Treatment for Impacted Teeth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About