2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success Factors in Developing EMA—Experiences from Four Follow-Up Case Studies in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some companies that have implemented EMA methodologies even discontinue implementing them (Kumpulainen & Poohjola,2008). EMA was found not to be value-adding for some adopters, and behavioral constraints have obstructed the smooth operation of the practice (Chang & Deegan, 2008;Gale, 2006a;Kumpulainen & Pohjola, 2008). These problems and challenges reported by a few companies having a pilot EMA project in their organization indirectly tell us that EMA implementation may also lead to unintended consequences and the method itself might have weaknesses that we do not realize, and which are worthwhile to be examined.…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestion For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some companies that have implemented EMA methodologies even discontinue implementing them (Kumpulainen & Poohjola,2008). EMA was found not to be value-adding for some adopters, and behavioral constraints have obstructed the smooth operation of the practice (Chang & Deegan, 2008;Gale, 2006a;Kumpulainen & Pohjola, 2008). These problems and challenges reported by a few companies having a pilot EMA project in their organization indirectly tell us that EMA implementation may also lead to unintended consequences and the method itself might have weaknesses that we do not realize, and which are worthwhile to be examined.…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestion For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In implementing EMA, Kumpulainen and Pohjola (2008) advice that the organisation's process is described in detail, the organisation's environmental impact be accounted and the organisation calculate its environmental costs and propose improvement areas in the process. Furthermore, Gray et al (2001) advice organisations to emphasise on how not what to account for the physical and monetary information, with the focus on energy usage, and management and control of waste as environmental improvement parameters could also be of help to EMA implementation.…”
Section: Proposed Framework For Ema Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When EMA implementation is considered, literature provides steps on how EMA could effectively be implemented in organisations (Gray et al 2001;Jasch et al 2010;and Kumpulainen & Pohjola 2008). Thus by following these steps and by adopting the proposed framework of 'United Nations' expert working group on EMA' (see Appendix II), EMA can effectively be implemented in the sector.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tudi v Poročilu MA, A Report of the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), je izpostavljena ugotovitev, da bodo naravni viri veliko bolje zaščiteni, če bodo o njih odločali v vršnem managementu kot pa le v oddelkih, odgovornih za okolje, ki imajo relativno šibko moč odločanja. Sicer pa Kumpulainen in Pohjola (2009) navajata, da se v mnogih podjetjih okoljskih izzivov ne obravnava kot enega integralnih delov osrednjih poslovnih procesov, ampak raje kot način za pomirjanje okoljsko osveščenih deležnikov. Nadalje razlagata, da so v primeru, če glavne dejavnosti panoge nimajo jasno izraženih okoljskih vplivov ali podjetje ni v povezavi s končnimi kupci, lahko okoljski vidiki lažje ignorirani.…”
Section: Temeljne Značilnosti Okoljskega Upravljanja Podjetijunclassified