Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01876232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success criteria and adaptive management for a large-scale wetland restoration project

Abstract: We are using a 20+ year photographic history of relatively undisturbed and formerly diked sites to predict the restoration trajectories and equilibrium size of a 4,050 ha salt marsh on Delaware Bay, New Jersey (USA). The project was initiated to offset the loss of finfishes fl'om once-through cooling at a local power plant. We used a simple food chain model to estimate the required restoration size. This model assumed that annual macrophyte detritus production and benthic algal production restilted in producti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its perceived poor value as habitat for consumers is a main reason behlnd current efforts to 'restore' P. australisdominated marshes back to marshes dominated by Spartina spp. (Jones & Lehman 1987, Marks et al 1993, Weinstein et al 1997, Weinstein & Balletto 1999). Yet, issues other than food quality per se, such as access to the marsh surface, or refuge from predators may clearly be involved (Weinstein & Balletto 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its perceived poor value as habitat for consumers is a main reason behlnd current efforts to 'restore' P. australisdominated marshes back to marshes dominated by Spartina spp. (Jones & Lehman 1987, Marks et al 1993, Weinstein et al 1997, Weinstein & Balletto 1999). Yet, issues other than food quality per se, such as access to the marsh surface, or refuge from predators may clearly be involved (Weinstein & Balletto 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Alloway Creek system was chosen as a system that is dominated by Phragmites australis (coverage is -66 %, but is especially high in the area surrounding our 2 study sites: Management Plan Advisory Committee 1997), while Mad Horse Creek is located -5 km down the bay, and is dominated by Spartina alterniflora. The 2 creek systems differ not only in their dominant macrophyte vegetation type but also in their hydrology, and geomorphological features such as drainage density, marsh elevation and creek-bank slopes (Weinstein et al 1997, Weinstein & Balletto 1999. Additional charac- teristics of the Mad Horse Creek study site are described in Able et al (unpubl.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sites ranged from the poly/mesohaline lower bay (mean salinity 12 to 20) to the oligo/mesohaline upper bay (0 to 12) and have been described in detail in Able et al (2000Able et al ( , 2001. Of the sampling sites, 3 were undergoing or had undergone restoration as part of the Public Service Enterprise Group's Estuary Enhancement Program during (or prior to) this study (Weinstein et al 1997). The 2 sites closest to the ocean, Dennis Township and Moores Beach, are close to each other and have similar physico-chemical conditions and fish faunas (Able et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control of water levels would be more efficient within impoundments of smaller size or with better drainage capability. Alternative methods of marsh management should also be explored (Weinstein et al 1997, Turner & Streever 2002.…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%