1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01205728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success breeds success. The dynamics of the innovation process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Mansfield (1968) and Stoneman (1983), however, emphasised that a firm's innovation success broadens its technological opportunities which make subsequent innovation success more likely. Based on this idea of dynamic intra-firm spill-overs, Flaig and Stadler (1994) developed a stochastic optimisation model in which firms maximise their expected present value of profits over an infinite time horizon by simultaneously choosing optimal sequences of both product and process innovations. Both were shown to be dynamically interrelated in this model.…”
Section: Theoretical Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Mansfield (1968) and Stoneman (1983), however, emphasised that a firm's innovation success broadens its technological opportunities which make subsequent innovation success more likely. Based on this idea of dynamic intra-firm spill-overs, Flaig and Stadler (1994) developed a stochastic optimisation model in which firms maximise their expected present value of profits over an infinite time horizon by simultaneously choosing optimal sequences of both product and process innovations. Both were shown to be dynamically interrelated in this model.…”
Section: Theoretical Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 A dummy variable indicating whether or not a firm exports its products and services controls for international competitive pressure. Previous innovation success is included to account for the persistence of innovation activity (see for instance Flaig and Stadler (1994) and Peters (2009)). Finally, two-digit sector dummies and a regional dummy (East/West Germany) are included in order to control for sector-specific and regional effects.…”
Section: Econometric Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a firm's past experience in innovation has a positive effect on current innovation. There are plenty of empirical studies on measuring the degree of persistence in innovation using the number of patents, the R&D effort or innovation output indicators as proxy variables (Flaig and Stadler, 1994;Malerba and Orsenigo, 1999;Cefis and Orsenigo, 2001;Cefis, 2003;Rogers, 2004;Duguet and Manjon, 2004;Cabagnols, 2006;Mañez-Castillejo et al, 2009;Peters, 2009;Triguero and Córcoles, 2013). But, as far as we know, only a few studies measure the degree of persistence in innovation considering innovative spells, i.e., periods of time during which the firm innovates year after year without gaps in its activity (Geroski et al, 1997;Le Bas et al, 2003;Cabagnols, 2003;Jang and Chen, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explanation is based on two arguments. First, knowledge accumulation enhances the probability of future innovation, the so-called "success breeds success" principle (Flaig and Stadler, 1994;Geroski et al, 1997). Second, the "learning by doing" effect must be taken into account in the persistence of innovative activities (Peters, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%