2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10100-013-0332-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success and decisiveness on proper symmetric games

Abstract: This paper provides a complete study for the possible rankings of success and decisiveness for individuals in symmetric voting systems, assuming anonymous and independent probability distributions. It is proved that for any pair of symmetric voting systems it is always possible to rank success and decisiveness in opposite order whenever the common probability of voting for "acceptance" is big enough. On the contrary, for probability values lower than one-half it is not possible to reverse the ranking of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using this technique we obtain new characterizations of these indices which simplifies their computation. We also analyze their properties and inter-relations, and we compare the rankings they induce on the set of voters, extending to more general voting contexts the comparative study of success and decisiveness done in (Freixas and Pons, 2015) for proper symmetric voting rules under independent and anonymous distributions. Other probabilistic power indices, i.e., power indices in assessed simple games, have been studied by using the MLE (Carreras, 2004(Carreras, , 2005Freixas andPons, 2005, 2008) but, as far as we know, the treatment of success, decisiveness and luckiness indices by using the MLE is novel and allows us to study new properties concerning these three indices: ordinal equivalence, egalitarianism and coherency with the strength of the seats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using this technique we obtain new characterizations of these indices which simplifies their computation. We also analyze their properties and inter-relations, and we compare the rankings they induce on the set of voters, extending to more general voting contexts the comparative study of success and decisiveness done in (Freixas and Pons, 2015) for proper symmetric voting rules under independent and anonymous distributions. Other probabilistic power indices, i.e., power indices in assessed simple games, have been studied by using the MLE (Carreras, 2004(Carreras, , 2005Freixas andPons, 2005, 2008) but, as far as we know, the treatment of success, decisiveness and luckiness indices by using the MLE is novel and allows us to study new properties concerning these three indices: ordinal equivalence, egalitarianism and coherency with the strength of the seats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, having a risky buyer might increase borrowing capacity and welfare. Freixas and Pons (2013) study the possible rankings of success and decisiveness for individuals in symmetric voting systems, assuming anonymous and independent probability distributions. They prove that for any pair of symmetric voting systems it is always possible to rank success and decisiveness in opposite order if the common probability of voting for "acceptance" is high enough.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%