2017
DOI: 10.1108/s1537-466120180000022009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subverting the Research Encounter: Context, Structure, and Agency in the Creative Analysis of Research Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the research process should be considered as a transformational process that facilitates knowledge generation and reciprocal learning through interaction between researchers and YP (Clark & Richards, 2017; Veale, 2005). Moreover, most participatory research with YP today gravitates around the use of alternative research methods such as drawings (McTague et al, 2017), focus groups (Zonio, 2017) and stories (McNamee & Frankel, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the research process should be considered as a transformational process that facilitates knowledge generation and reciprocal learning through interaction between researchers and YP (Clark & Richards, 2017; Veale, 2005). Moreover, most participatory research with YP today gravitates around the use of alternative research methods such as drawings (McTague et al, 2017), focus groups (Zonio, 2017) and stories (McNamee & Frankel, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%