2018
DOI: 10.1515/jgth-2018-0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subvariety structures in certain product varieties of groups

Abstract: We classify certain cases when the wreath products of distinct pairs of groups generate the same variety. This allows us to investigate the subvarieties of some nilpotentby-abelian product varieties UV with the help of wreath products of groups. In particular, using wreath products we find such subvarieties in nilpotent-by-abelian UV, which have the same nilpotency class, the same length of solubility, and the same exponent, but which still are distinct subvarieties. Obtained classification strengthens our rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we do prove the part "These two conditions are easy, but a little tedious, to check, and this is left to the reader" on p. 472 in [11], and we do give a proof for Lemma 2.2 mentioned in [11] as "obvious from the normal form theorem". In fact, we could shorten the proofs even more by evolving some of our wreath product methods [14]- [17]. However, we intentionally keep technique within free products with amalgamations and HNN-extensions to preserve Higman's original idea of investigation of recursion via free constructions.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Current Modification Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we do prove the part "These two conditions are easy, but a little tedious, to check, and this is left to the reader" on p. 472 in [11], and we do give a proof for Lemma 2.2 mentioned in [11] as "obvious from the normal form theorem". In fact, we could shorten the proofs even more by evolving some of our wreath product methods [14]- [17]. However, we intentionally keep technique within free products with amalgamations and HNN-extensions to preserve Higman's original idea of investigation of recursion via free constructions.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Current Modification Withmentioning
confidence: 99%