2021
DOI: 10.1002/mus.27177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subunit specificity of the acetylcholine receptor antibodies in double seropositive myasthenia gravis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there was no difference in the patient's clinical profile when the anti-nAChR autoAbs titer increased, probably due to the presence of only anti-γ autoAbs ( Table 1 ). By these observations, we had previously reported a double positive MG patient (anti-nAChR and anti-MuSK autoAbs positive) who was presented with MuSK phenotype ( 25 ). This patient's clinical manifestation of the disease was not affected by the increase of the anti-nAChR autoAbs titer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, there was no difference in the patient's clinical profile when the anti-nAChR autoAbs titer increased, probably due to the presence of only anti-γ autoAbs ( Table 1 ). By these observations, we had previously reported a double positive MG patient (anti-nAChR and anti-MuSK autoAbs positive) who was presented with MuSK phenotype ( 25 ). This patient's clinical manifestation of the disease was not affected by the increase of the anti-nAChR autoAbs titer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…After immunoadsorption, we showed that in all sera from different time points, the patient had relatively small amounts of anti-α1 autoAbs and the vast majority of autoAbs were directed against the β1 and γ subunits. We concluded that the patient did not show any clinical deterioration, because the pathogenic anti-α1 autoAbs were always in low concentration, while the increase of the anti-nAChR autoAbs titer was attributed to the increase of only the less pathogenic anti-β1 and anti-γ autoAbs ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanisms by which AChR-Ab and MuSK-Ab cause pathologies in DSP-MG have not been deciphered. Analysis of subunit specificity of AChR-Ab in a DSP-MG patient revealed the presence of autoantibodies against β1 and γ subunits rather than the dominant α1 subunit, potentially explaining the resemblance between MuSK-MG and DSP-MG. 47 There lies as well the possibility that the pathological effects of MuSK-Ab could interfere with those of AChR-Ab or vice versa to some extent, and thus the phenotype of DSP-MG may still vary among patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%