Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-2113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtyping Basal Cell Carcinoma by Clinical Diagnosis Versus Punch Biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree with Wolberink et al . and Roozeboom et al . that in selected cases, a punch biopsy can be omitted to confirm BCC diagnosis and divide between subtypes.…”
Section: Characteristics and Diagnostic Accuracy Of The Included Studsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We agree with Wolberink et al . and Roozeboom et al . that in selected cases, a punch biopsy can be omitted to confirm BCC diagnosis and divide between subtypes.…”
Section: Characteristics and Diagnostic Accuracy Of The Included Studsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Of those, five studies with a total of 1285 punch-biopsy-proven primary BCC lesions were finally included in this systematic review (Table 1). [6][7][8][9][10] The most frequently diagnosed subtype was nBCC, in all five studies. The presence of a secondary subtype (mBCC) ranged from 19% to 74% in either biopsy or excision specimen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings suggest that preoperative histological subtype determination might be useful to indicate when wider clinical tumor-free excision margins are needed. Although in 1 out of 6 BCCs the most aggressive growth pattern is missed by the preoperative biopsy (i.e., sampling error), a biopsy was shown to be more sensitive and more specific than the clinical diagnosis on the histological subtype [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%