Subtypes of work engagement in frontline supporting nurses during COVID‐19 pandemic: A latent profile analysis

Abstract

Aim The aim was to examine the subgroups of work engagement in frontline nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Background The pandemic may affect the work engagement of nurses who have direct contact with infected patients and lead to a poor quality of care. Identifying classification features of work engagement and tailoring interventions to support frontline nurses is imperative. Design This study utilized a cross‐sectional study design. Methods Three hundred fifty‐five nurses were enrolled in this cross‐sectional study from 14 February to 15 April 2020. A latent profile analysis was performed to identify classification features of work engagement. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine predictors of profile membership. Results A four‐profile model provided the best fit. The four profiles were titled ‘low work engagement’ ( n = 99), ‘high vigour‐low dedication and absorption’ ( n = 58), ‘moderate work engagement’ ( n = 63) and ‘high work engagement’ ( n = 135). A regression analysis suggested that young nurses and nurses who were the only children of their family were more likely to be in the ‘low work engagement’ and ‘high vigour‐low dedication and absorption’ groups. Conclusion This study highlights the importance of tailoring interventions for frontline supporting nurses by considering their distinct work engagement patterns, especially during the COVID‐19 pandemic, to improve the promotion of work satisfaction and quality of care. Impact This was the first study to explore the latent profiles of work engagement in frontline nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Over 40% of nurses were in the ‘low work engagement’ and ‘high vigour‐low dedication and absorption’ groups and reported low levels of work engagement. Understanding different patterns of work engagement in frontline nurses can help nursing managers provide emotional, material and organizational support based on the features of each latent profile, which may improve the quality of care and patient safety.

Work immersion and perceived stress among clinical nurses: A latent profile analysis and moderated mediation analysis

“…Work immersion was negatively related to perceived stress, and this relationship has been previously established [34,35] . The study also employed latent pro le analysis to identify heterogeneity in the work immersion of nurses and found results for four latent subgroups, which is consistent with Yin et al [75] and supports the second hypothesis. Our study showed that more than 50% of nurses were in the low or moderately low work immersion group.…”

Relationship between chronic disease resource utilization and quality of life in coronary heart disease patients: A latent profile analysis

“…Patients were excluded if they had (i) psychiatric disorders, confusion or severe cognitive impairment, (ii) accompanied by severe organ damage or having malignant tumours. Based on previous studies (Kline, 2015;Park et al, 2022;Yin et al, 2022), we argue that LPA would have reliable statistical results when the sample size reaches 300. Therefore, 400 questionnaires were distributed.…”

What are ‘emerging methodologies’ in nursing research? Our perspectives as early career researchers

“…Latent profile analysis (LPA), a method to detect latent sub‐populations within a population from observed data (Spurk et al, 2020), has recently been featured in JAN publications. Choi et al (2022) used LPA to detect profiles of second victim symptoms among nurses, and Yin et al (2022) used it to identify subtypes of work engagement in frontline supporting nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Counterfactual medial analysis (Bulfone et al, 2022) and actor–partner interdependence model (Yuliana et al, 2023), both recently published in JAN , are nuanced methods necessary to understanding how variables may relate and interact through indirect and previously underexplored pathways.…”