2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41420-018-0069-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtype-specific response of retinal ganglion cells to optic nerve crush

Abstract: Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease with retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss, optic nerve degeneration and subsequent vision loss. There are about 30 different subtypes of RGCs whose response to glaucomatous injury is not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of 4 RGC subtypes in a mouse model of optic nerve crush (ONC). In this study, we also evaluated the pattern of axonal degeneration in RGC subtypes after nerve injury. We found that out of the 4 subtypes, transient-Off… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Axon damage induced by injury such as from increased intraocular pressure leads to enhanced RGC excitability that can temporarily delay degeneration (Risner et al, 2018). It has also been reported that intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are more resistant to insult than other RGC subtypes because of their increased electrical excitability (Li et al, 2006;Daniel et al, 2018). In these examples, increased electrical activity correlates with enhanced neuroprotection, consistent with the enhanced RGC survival with PDE4D3 displacement in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Axon damage induced by injury such as from increased intraocular pressure leads to enhanced RGC excitability that can temporarily delay degeneration (Risner et al, 2018). It has also been reported that intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are more resistant to insult than other RGC subtypes because of their increased electrical excitability (Li et al, 2006;Daniel et al, 2018). In these examples, increased electrical activity correlates with enhanced neuroprotection, consistent with the enhanced RGC survival with PDE4D3 displacement in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Previous studies have used various injury and disease models in different animals to elucidate the loss of specific RGCs subtypes, with results somewhat variable based on the model system or the organism used (Birke et al, 2010;Cui et al, 2015;Daniel et al, 2018;Duan et al, 2015;El-Danaf and Huberman, 2015;Majander et al, 2017;Ou et al, 2016;Puyang et al, 2017;Yucel et al, 2003). Results of the current study demonstrated a high susceptibility for direction selective-RGCs and alpha-RGCs following injury, with their survival significantly decreasing after 7 days post ONC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In contrast to the high susceptibility of certain RGC subtypes, non-image forming ip-RGCs exhibited differential survival following injury compared to image forming direction selective-and alpha-RGCs in the current study. The preferential survival of ip-RGCs has been observed in other studies which utilized rat and mice injury and disease models, with this subtype in particular demonstrating resilience to insult (Cui et al, 2015;Daniel et al, 2018;Li et al, 2006;Li et al, 2008;Perez de Sevilla Muller et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2018). ip-RGCs are unique in that they have the ability to respond to light using the photopigment, Melanopsin, and play a role in non-image forming functions including circadian rhythms and pupillary reflexes by projecting to the superior colliculus, a non-image forming brain region (Chew et al, 2017;Hannibal et al, 2017;Kelbsch et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations