Subtype classification for prediction of prognosis of breast cancer from a biomarker panel: correlations and indications

Abstract

Background Hormone receptors, including the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and other biomarkers like Ki67, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, also known as HER1), the androgen receptor, and p53, are key molecules in breast cancer. This study evaluated the relationship between HER2 and hormone receptors and explored the additional prognostic value of Ki67, EGFR, the androgen receptor, and p53. Methods Quantitative determination of HER2 and EGFR was performed in 240 invasive breast cancer tissue microarray specimens using quantum dot (QD)-based nanotechnology. We identified two subtypes of HER2, ie, high total HER2 load (HTH2) and low total HER2 load (LTH2), and three subtypes of hormone receptor, ie, high hormone receptor (HHR), low hormone receptor (LHR), and no hormone receptor (NHR). Therefore, breast cancer patients could be divided into five subtypes according to HER2 and hormone receptor status. Ki67, p53, and the androgen receptor were determined by traditional immunohistochemistry techniques. The relationship between hormone receptors and HER2 was investigated and the additional value of Ki67, EGFR, the androgen receptor, and p53 for prediction of 5-year disease-free survival was assessed. Results In all patients, quantitative determination showed a statistically significant ( P <0.001) negative correlation between HER2 and the hormone receptors and a significant positive correlation ( P <0.001) between the estrogen receptor and the progesterone receptor ( r =0.588), but a significant negative correlation ( P <0.001, r =−0.618) with the HHR subtype. There were significant differences between the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 subtypes with regard to total HER2 load and hormone receptor subtypes. The rates of androgen receptor and p53 positivity were 46.3% and 57.0%, respectively. Other than the androgen receptor, differences in expression of Ki67, EGFR, and p53 did not achieve statistical significance ( P >0.05) between the five subtypes. EGFR and Ki67 had prognostic significance for 5-year disease-free survival in univariate analysis, but the androgen receptor and p53 did not. Multivariate analysis identified that EGFR expression had predictive significance for 5-year disease-free survival in hormone-receptor positive patients and in those with the lymph node-positive breast cancer subtype. Conclusion Hormone receptor expression was indeed one of the molecular profiles in the subtypes identified by quantitative HER2 and vice versa. EGFR status may provide discriminative prognostic information in addition to HER2 and hormone receptor status, and should be integrated into routine practice to help formulate more specific prediction of the prognosis and appropr...

Prediction of Low versus High Recurrence Scores in Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Lymph Node–Negative Invasive Breast Cancer on the Basis of Radiologic-Pathologic Features: Comparison with Oncotype DX Test Recurrence Scores

“…Currently, a standard surgical pathology report on a breast carcinoma specimen should contain several aspects of the tumor biology that provide prognostic and predictive information. These include but are not limited to tumor type, tumor size, tumor grade, and lymph node status (9)(10)(11)(12). Tumor proliferation is reported as the mitotic count component of the Nottingham grade (13).…”

Progress in the clinical detection of heterogeneity in breast cancer

“…When performing multiplex imaging of various key immunomarkers such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Her-2, and the Ki-67 protein simultaneously, we found new tumor characteristics that were associated with breast cancer prognosis [81][82][83]. Furthermore, Chen and colleagues divided patients with breast cancer into five new subtypes through QD-based quantitative determination of HER2 and EGFR in combination with hormone receptor status [83]. To summarize, QDs-IHC provides new insight into the heterogeneity of breast cancer and will play an important role in individualized breast cancer treatment.…”

Quantum dot-based immunofluorescent imaging and quantitative detection of TOP2A and prognostic value in triple-negative breast cancer

“…[19][20][21] Our previous studies using QD-based molecular pathology for molecular targeted imaging and quantitative detection of cancer cells and molecules were associated with a number of potential advantages over conventional IHC methods, such as superior fluorescent efficiency over organic fluorescent dyes, better signal clarity, higher sensitivity, and more accurate quantitative analyses. [21][22][23][24] However, the use of QD technology for quantifying TOP2A protein expression in TNBC has not yet been investigated.…”