1996
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography.

Abstract: Hard-copy and soft-copy chest CR images are acceptable and available in place of screen-film images for primary interpretation of subtle interstitial lung diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of this study, CR was considered the 'gold standard' for technical quality. 16 In terms of technical factors, rotation evaluation was similar for both modalities, while the erect Statscan images were prone to exposure artefacts in the form of the chevron exposure artefact mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For the purposes of this study, CR was considered the 'gold standard' for technical quality. 16 In terms of technical factors, rotation evaluation was similar for both modalities, while the erect Statscan images were prone to exposure artefacts in the form of the chevron exposure artefact mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…14 Briefl y, the collection of these images was carried out as follows: The CR images were obtained with the storage phosphor plates (ST III; Fujifi lm, Tokyo, Japan), and various parameters were used for making images similar to conventional screen-fi lm images. 1,14 The 63 patients (31 men, 32 women) underwent high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest within 1 week of acquiring these chest CR images. 1,14 The fi nal diagnosis for each patient was made initially using their HRCT images and was established by a side-by-side review of their chest plain radiography and HRCT images by the consensus of a panel of 10 experienced radiologists who did not participate in the image-reading experiment.…”
Section: Test Image Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,14 The 63 patients (31 men, 32 women) underwent high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest within 1 week of acquiring these chest CR images. 1,14 The fi nal diagnosis for each patient was made initially using their HRCT images and was established by a side-by-side review of their chest plain radiography and HRCT images by the consensus of a panel of 10 experienced radiologists who did not participate in the image-reading experiment. 1,14 The CR image data were stored as the image data with a matrix size of 1760 × 1760 or 1760 × 2140 and with a gray level of 10 bits and were transformed into the DICOM image fi le format.…”
Section: Test Image Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies reported that the lower spatial resolution would result in a lower detectability of linear or micro-nodular opacities, as seen in pleural lines or interstitial disease [2][3][4]. Other authors, however, concluded that 2-K hardcopy chest radiographs perform equivalently to film if adequate processing is applied [5][6][7][8]10]. Similarly it has been shown in contrast detail phantom studies that detail detectability is described insufficiently by pixel size and spatial resolution alone, but relies on a complex interaction of contrast and spatial resolution more adequately described by the modulation transfer function (MTF; [9,11,16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%