2017
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aan3398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtle modifications to oxytocin produce ligands that retain potency and improved selectivity across species

Abstract: Oxytocin and vasopressin mediate various physiological functions that are important for osmoregulation, reproduction, cardiovascular function, social behavior, memory, and learning through four G protein-coupled receptors that are also implicated in high-profile disorders. Targeting these receptors is challenging because of the difficulty in obtaining ligands that retain selectivity across rodents and humans for translational studies. We identified a selective and more stable oxytocin receptor (OTR) agonist by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our observations that naturally occurring modifications in the OT/OTR system among NWMs lead to significant functional consequences provides an intriguing ‘natural experiment’ to explore OT under a new lens. Our approach should be viewed as complementary to efforts that explore laboratory-induced changes in the OT molecule as a means to discover super potent and efficacious synthetic ligands as potential candidates for clinically relevant endpoints (e.g., Busnelli et al 2016; Muttenthaler et al 2017). Overall, these findings from OT pharmacology to OT-induced behavioral changes clearly demonstrate that OT/OTR structural modifications in NWM that arise from natural selection can orchestrate important changes in OT-mediated physiological and behavioral outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our observations that naturally occurring modifications in the OT/OTR system among NWMs lead to significant functional consequences provides an intriguing ‘natural experiment’ to explore OT under a new lens. Our approach should be viewed as complementary to efforts that explore laboratory-induced changes in the OT molecule as a means to discover super potent and efficacious synthetic ligands as potential candidates for clinically relevant endpoints (e.g., Busnelli et al 2016; Muttenthaler et al 2017). Overall, these findings from OT pharmacology to OT-induced behavioral changes clearly demonstrate that OT/OTR structural modifications in NWM that arise from natural selection can orchestrate important changes in OT-mediated physiological and behavioral outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its ability to modulate a wide variety of social behaviors (Lee et al, 2009), OT is currently being evaluated for its clinical use in disorders with a social component, such as autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia (Bakermans-Kranenburg and van Ijzendoorn, 2013;Feifel et al, 2016;DeMayo et al, 2017;Parker et al, 2017). Considerable effort has been invested in engineering OT analogs and formulations for potential therapeutic use and to extend understanding of OT actions, particularly central nervous system and behavioral effects (Manning et al, 2012;Busnelli et al, 2013;Muttenthaler et al, 2017). Although these efforts with novel synthetic analogs have been reasonably successful, naturally occurring variants of the OT peptide could provide an alternate route to novel agents and therapies (Gruber et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonapeptide family of hormone ligands is ancient and is present in nearly all animal lineages (Beets et al, 2013;Lockard et al, 2017). OT-like ligands generally vary at the third, fourth, or eighth amino acid position (Gruber et al, 2012), and the amino acid at the eighth position strongly affects the activity of the peptide on its target organs (Sawyer and Manning, 1973;Manning et al, 2012;Muttenthaler et al, 2017). OT and the closely related nonapeptide arginine vasopressin (AVP) differ at amino acid positions 3 and 8 and have vastly different roles in mammalian physiology, even though the affinity of OT for OTRs is only 2-fold greater than the affinity of AVP for OTRs (Manning et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the translational perspectives, in vivo studies targeting OTR in human breast cancer xenograft models are required. OT, while important as the endogenous ligand, might also not be the ideal ligand for therapeutic development, considering that it also activates the three to OTR closely related vasopressin receptors (V 1a R, V 1b R, V 2 R, discussed in sections below) [103] and its short systemic half-life [104]. More systematic studies and OTR drug lead development is, in our opinion, necessary before moving towards clinical translation.…”
Section: In Vivo Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) [4,8,133]. The homology of the binding sites of the OTR and VPRs is~80%, thus leading to significant cross-talk [103,134,135]. OT can not only activate OTR, but also the VPRs, while VP can also activate OTR.…”
Section: Bottlenecks For Targeting Otr In Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%