2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp03367k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtle hydrogen bonds: benchmarking with OH stretching fundamentals of vicinal diols in the gas phase

Abstract: The theoretical description of spectral signatures for weakly bound hydrogen contacts between alcohol groups is challenging and remains poorly characterised. By combining Raman jet spectroscopy with appropriately scaled harmonic DFT...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(152 reference statements)
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The IR absorption spectra in the OH-stretching region looks more interesting since it exhibits a sharp feature at 3612 cm −1 , common to all three compounds, and a broad feature at 3542 cm −1 in all three compounds, plus another broad hump centered at 3487 cm −1 for 1 . Following Paoloni et al [ 32 ] (see also the more recent work by Hartwig and Suhm [ 37 ]), who carefully investigated the cases of diols, we think that the 3612 cm −1 is due to the OH-stretching in either the 3- or 9- position acting as an acceptor of H-bond and behaving almost as an OH-stretching “free” from H-bond. We believe the 3542 cm −1 feature instead to be due to OH stretching in donor intramolecular H-bonding for the 3 position (common to 1 , 2, and 3 ) and the 3487 cm −1 feature to be due to OH stretching in donor intramolecular H-bonding for the 9 position (present only in 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The IR absorption spectra in the OH-stretching region looks more interesting since it exhibits a sharp feature at 3612 cm −1 , common to all three compounds, and a broad feature at 3542 cm −1 in all three compounds, plus another broad hump centered at 3487 cm −1 for 1 . Following Paoloni et al [ 32 ] (see also the more recent work by Hartwig and Suhm [ 37 ]), who carefully investigated the cases of diols, we think that the 3612 cm −1 is due to the OH-stretching in either the 3- or 9- position acting as an acceptor of H-bond and behaving almost as an OH-stretching “free” from H-bond. We believe the 3542 cm −1 feature instead to be due to OH stretching in donor intramolecular H-bonding for the 3 position (common to 1 , 2, and 3 ) and the 3487 cm −1 feature to be due to OH stretching in donor intramolecular H-bonding for the 9 position (present only in 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For systems bridged in such a way no other ring sizes have been To distinguish between the many different conformers a few extra signifiers are added to the shorthand notation which have been previously discussed in Refs. [18,165]. These are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: 2-diol Monomersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the large amount of molecules studied in this work, systematic abbreviations for the different systems are introduced which have previously been laid out in Ref. [165]. The different systems are classified according to the substitution geminal to each OH group.…”
Section: 2-diol Monomersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations