2016
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000001053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subthreshold Micropulse Diode Laser Versus Conventional Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

Abstract: Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment resulted in better visual acuity compared with conventional laser, although the differences before 12 months are likely to be too small to be of clinical relevance and may be dependent on baseline best-corrected visual acuity. The two types of treatment seem to have similar anatomical outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, SML might be an option in patients not responding sufficiently to, or who are not able to follow an anti-VEGF therapy (e.g., high costs, compliance problems due to frequent visits for the injections and ophthalmological controls). Chen et al [77] had come to a similar result in their meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional laser. They reported a significantly better visual acuity and a similar decrease in CRT after SML compared to conventional laser.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, SML might be an option in patients not responding sufficiently to, or who are not able to follow an anti-VEGF therapy (e.g., high costs, compliance problems due to frequent visits for the injections and ophthalmological controls). Chen et al [77] had come to a similar result in their meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional laser. They reported a significantly better visual acuity and a similar decrease in CRT after SML compared to conventional laser.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] SMPL does not induce protein coagulation, and, therefore, prevents formation of retinal scars and tissue damage. 1,7 Even if SMPL has proven to be an effective treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME), in terms of visual function improvement/stabilization and macular thickness decrease, 3,4,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] the exact mechanism of action is still under investigation. Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) has been considered the main target with the consequent release of "heat shock proteins" (Hsps), in particular Hsp 70.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nach einer Behandlung mit einem gelben Mikropulslaser (577 nm, Iridex IQ, 5 % Duty Cycle, 0,2 sm 250 MW) wurde nach 3 Monaten eine positive Änderung im tiefen Kapillarplexus beobachtet (Iridex, Mannheim, Deutschland) [251]. Wenige randomisierte Studien haben ein ähnliches funktionelles und anatomisches Ansprechen im Vergleich zu konventionellen Lasern gezeigt, obwohl nach der Behandlung mittels Subthreshold-Laser unter Umständen mehr Zeit bis zur Resorption der Flüssigkeit verstreichen dürfte [252,253].…”
Section: 1-2 Ivom-therapie Mit Steroidenunclassified