2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00693-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
112
0
15

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
112
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…To test whether rTMS at this site actually interfered with M1, we studied rTMS-induced changes in single-pulse TMS measures of corticospinal excitability, i.e., rMT and MEP size, before and after the rTMS procedure. Consistent with previous reports (11,17,18,36,37,40,46,56,57), 1-Hz rTMS resulted in an acute reduction of corticospinal excitability (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Role Of Primary Motor Cortex In Maximal Voluntary Forcesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To test whether rTMS at this site actually interfered with M1, we studied rTMS-induced changes in single-pulse TMS measures of corticospinal excitability, i.e., rMT and MEP size, before and after the rTMS procedure. Consistent with previous reports (11,17,18,36,37,40,46,56,57), 1-Hz rTMS resulted in an acute reduction of corticospinal excitability (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Role Of Primary Motor Cortex In Maximal Voluntary Forcesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Still, the precise mechanism of how rTMS interfered with motor performance is unclear. One possibility is that chronic 1-Hz rTMS activated cortical inhibitory interneurons (11,17,18,36,37,40,46,56,57) and reduced cortical and corticospinal excitability (Figs. 2 and 3) and the responsiveness of M1 to stimulation arising from central drive.…”
Section: Role Of Primary Motor Cortex In Maximal Voluntary Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subthreshold, low-frequency rTMS was applied to the hand area of the left M1 for 10 min using an established protocol to induce LTD-like plasticity (23) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DWI can be used to evaluate morphological changes in cortical microstructures (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) and can function as a probe to estimate immediate and transient changes in water diffusion that are associated with ischemia (17) or neuronal firing (13,16,19) and delayed and persistent changes that are associated with long-term plasticity in experimental settings (20) or pathological conditions (15,18,21). Here, using DWI techniques, we examined whether subthreshold, low-frequency (<1 Hz) rTMS to the left primary motor cortex (M1), a protocol that induces LTD-like plasticity (22,23), increased water diffusion in the left M1 and other regions after the end of rTMS. Because it can be assumed that the motion of water molecules is not restricted to particular directions, that is, water diffusion is not anisotropic within cortical tissue, we measured the DWI signals along a single direction (Methods), which enabled us to extrapolate mean water diffusion in gray matter in the sampled direction (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation, however, implies that low frequency rTMS as used in the current study increases the activity of inhibitory interneurons. As several studies suggested, low-frequency rTMS of the primary motor cortex does not lead to increased intracortical inhibition as revealed by subsequent paired-pulse TMS (Brighina et al, 2005;Daskalakis et al, 2006;Fitzgerald et al, 2002;Romero et al, 2002). Based on this evidence it seems less likely that the observed increased rCBF results from an active inhibition process induced by low-frequency rTMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%