2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17849-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subthalamic nucleus detects unnatural android movement

Abstract: An android, i.e., a realistic humanoid robot with human-like capabilities, may induce an uncanny feeling in human observers. The uncanny feeling about an android has two main causes: its appearance and movement. The uncanny feeling about an android increases when its appearance is almost human-like but its movement is not fully natural or comparable to human movement. Even if an android has human-like flexible joints, its slightly jerky movements cause a human observer to detect subtle unnaturalness in them. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We predicted that an agent exhibiting simple dynamic facial expressions (e.g., unnatural lip sync) would evoke more eeriness and less learning outcomes than total static facial expressions or totally human and complex dynamic facial expressions. In this line, previous research with multimedia agents has shown these detrimental outcomes when the agents approach but fail to imitate the social naturality of humans (e.g., Ikeda et al 2017;Tinwell et al 2011;Veletsianos 2012).…”
Section: Nonverbal Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predicted that an agent exhibiting simple dynamic facial expressions (e.g., unnatural lip sync) would evoke more eeriness and less learning outcomes than total static facial expressions or totally human and complex dynamic facial expressions. In this line, previous research with multimedia agents has shown these detrimental outcomes when the agents approach but fail to imitate the social naturality of humans (e.g., Ikeda et al 2017;Tinwell et al 2011;Veletsianos 2012).…”
Section: Nonverbal Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%