2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtarsal Versus Transconjunctival Approach: A Long-Term Follow-Up of Esthetic Outcomes and Complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there is an increased risk for noticeable scar as the incision is further away from the lash line in comparison to a subciliary approach. 12 Contrary to this, in 2021, Oztel et al 47 found that out of a series of 67 patients who underwent subtarsal incision for orbital wall fractures, 61 had no visible scar. Although the conjunctival incision has no scar, the excellent outcomes proposed by Oztel et al 47 demonstrate that scar formation may actually be limited, and that subtarsal incisions should be considered when reconstructing the orbital wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, there is an increased risk for noticeable scar as the incision is further away from the lash line in comparison to a subciliary approach. 12 Contrary to this, in 2021, Oztel et al 47 found that out of a series of 67 patients who underwent subtarsal incision for orbital wall fractures, 61 had no visible scar. Although the conjunctival incision has no scar, the excellent outcomes proposed by Oztel et al 47 demonstrate that scar formation may actually be limited, and that subtarsal incisions should be considered when reconstructing the orbital wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 12 Contrary to this, in 2021, Oztel et al 47 found that out of a series of 67 patients who underwent subtarsal incision for orbital wall fractures, 61 had no visible scar. Although the conjunctival incision has no scar, the excellent outcomes proposed by Oztel et al 47 demonstrate that scar formation may actually be limited, and that subtarsal incisions should be considered when reconstructing the orbital wall. Finally, when comparing surgical approaches, it is imperative to consider exposure and access for selecting the best approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therein, the pain level of the wounds was mainly assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [ 25 ]. The assessment of wound healing was primarily performed by visual observation and superficial measurements, such as monitoring the size, color, odor, drainage, and eschar of the wound, and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) [ 26 ] and Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) [ 27 ] were used to quantify the wound assessment outcomes for patients. Specifically, each patient was evaluated by the surgeons from the same medical team before and after PRP treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Häufiger kommt es im Rahmen von Narbenbildungen zu einem Entropion des Unterlides. Die Häufigkeit wird mit etwa 0,5 % angegeben [513,[515][516][517]. Die meisten Komplikationen sind temporär und führen nur selten zur Notwendigkeit einer erneuten Operation.…”
Section: Transkonjuktivale Zugangswegeunclassified