Subtalar Joint Arthroscopy

Srour, Jonathon; Rubin, Laurence G.

doi:10.1016/j.cpm.2023.03.001

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 8 This arthroscopic approach avoids extensive joint dissection and disruption of the soft tissue envelope, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative wound complications while facilitating accelerated return to activities compared to traditional open techniques. 9 This is reflected in this current retrospective study as no wound complications nor infections were observed in this study. In addition, arthroscopic evaluation of OCLs has been demonstrated to provide superior assessment of the size of OCLs in comparison with MRI, 1 thus making subtalar arthroscopic evaluation an attractive diagnostic modality.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 53%

Osteochondral Lesions of the Subtalar Joint: Clinical Outcomes in 11 Patients

Buck,

Butler,

Azam

et al. 2023

CARTILAGE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The purpose of this retrospective case series was to evaluate clinical outcomes following both conservative treatment and arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for the management of symptomatic subtalar osteochondral lesions (OCLs). Design All symptomatic subtalar OCLs with a minimum of 12 months follow-up having undergone either a conservative management or arthroscopic procedure were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected via questionnaires consisting of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain in rest, during walking, during stair climbing, and during running. In addition, return to sports data, return to work data, reoperations, and complications were collected and assessed. In total, 11 patients across 2 academic institutions were included (3 males, 8 females). The median age was 43 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 32-53). Results All patients underwent conservative treatment first; in addition, 9 patients underwent subtalar arthroscopic debridement with or without BMS. The median follow-up time was 15 months (IQR: 14-100). In the surgically treated group, the median NRS scores were 2 (IQR: 1-3) during rest, 3 (IQR: 2-4) during walking, 4 (IQR: 4-5) during stair climbing, 5 (IQR: 4-5) during running and the median FAOS score at final follow-up was 74 (IQR: 65-83). In the conservatively treated patients, the median NRS scores were all 0 (IQR: 0-0) and the median FAOS scores were 90 (IQR: 85-94). In the group of surgical treated patients, 4 were able to return to the same level of sports, 2 returned to a lower level of sports. Both conservatively treated patients returned to the sport and the same level of prior participation. All patients except one in the surgical group returned to work. Conclusions This retrospective case series demonstrated that a high number of patients converted to surgery after initial conservative treatment. In addition, debridement and BMS show good clinical outcomes for the management of symptomatic subtalar OCLs at short-term follow-up. No complications nor secondary surgical procedures were noted in the surgically treated group. The high rate of failure of conservative treatment suggests that surgical intervention for symptomatic subtalar OCLs can be the primary treatment strategy; however, further research is warranted in light of the small number of patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 53%