2018
DOI: 10.17656/jzs.10659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface Water Retention Technology (SWRT) for Water Saving and Growing Tomato in Iraqi Sandy Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last two decades, other studies followed by applying plastic films instead. Elawady et al (2003) reported 18% yield increase in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) [21] whilst Awady et al (2008) found a 141% to 190% increase in tomato fruit yield (Solanum lycopersicum L.) [22] Other studies performed in Iraq highlighted positive effects of plastic SWRSs on both yield and water use efficiency in the chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) [23,24]. Kavdir et al (2014) investigated the use of impermeable membranes in irrigated sandy soils and an increase in corn production was assessed to be as high as 238% more than under normal conditions [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades, other studies followed by applying plastic films instead. Elawady et al (2003) reported 18% yield increase in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) [21] whilst Awady et al (2008) found a 141% to 190% increase in tomato fruit yield (Solanum lycopersicum L.) [22] Other studies performed in Iraq highlighted positive effects of plastic SWRSs on both yield and water use efficiency in the chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) [23,24]. Kavdir et al (2014) investigated the use of impermeable membranes in irrigated sandy soils and an increase in corn production was assessed to be as high as 238% more than under normal conditions [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the effect of the interaction between poultry manure and the elements, the results showed that there were significant differences between the treatments if the highest value was for the M 2 E mg treatment (1.5400) and the lowest value for the M 0 E zn treatment (1.0111), This is attributed to the overlapping effect between the poultry manure and the elements and the role of organic matter in retaining the nutrients. Through its effective aggregates that act as a chelating substance that preserves the elements from loss and increases their readiness [20,29]. As for the effect of the triple interference between the treatments, if the highest value is for the treatment P 2 M 2 E mg (1.6300) and the lowest value is for the treatment P 0 M 0 E mg (0.3033), this is due to the overlapping effect of the three-way factors involved in the experiment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%