1993
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1993.43.2.315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
117
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Addenbrooke et al [1] and Mair et al [22]) contrary to the MC model which leads to a trough that fails to coincide with a Gaussian curve.…”
Section: Reference Calculation (H = 2d and K D = 35%)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Addenbrooke et al [1] and Mair et al [22]) contrary to the MC model which leads to a trough that fails to coincide with a Gaussian curve.…”
Section: Reference Calculation (H = 2d and K D = 35%)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The settlement curves obtained in this way were then compared with different empirical equations in the literature (e.g. Attewell [5]; Clough and Schmidt [13]; O'Reilly and New [25]; Sagaseta [29]; Rankin [27]; Chapeau [12] and Mair et al [22]) summarized by Dias [14] (Fig. 10).…”
Section: Sensitivity Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that Jones (2010) showed that the Mair et al (1993) expression can overestimate the value of K for deep tunnels. Based on field data measurements, Jones proposed a logarithmic formula for the prediction of K which depends on the height above the tunnel z t À z rather than the relative depth z/z t .…”
Section: Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground movements due to greenfield tunnelling in undrained clay are generally well understood (Mair et al, 1993;Mair & Taylor, 1997;Grant & Taylor, 2000). However, the available data for ground movements above tunnels in coarse-grained soils from case studies (Dyer et al, 1996;Sagaseta et al, 1999;Fargnoli et al, 2013) and centrifuge tests Marshall et al, 2012) are rather limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of an excavation damaged zone (EDZ) vary with the geological conditions, ground stress, excavation method and opening geometry [2], and have been extensively investigated with different methods [3]. Traditionally, the empirical methods [4,5,6] based on limited field data had frequently been used in calculating surface settlement. As advancement of the technologies for tunnel excavation, numerical modeling method has played an important role in simulating the stress path in the stress redistribution field created by the tunneling impacts [7,8], the swelling phenomenon around tunnels [9], acoustic emission in large-scale underground excavations [10], EDZ development in brittle rocks [11], time-dependent nature of EDZ [12], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%