1998
DOI: 10.2172/6527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface electromagnetic measurement through steel casing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the length is increased to 0.08 m and beyond, however, the response rapidly increases, and it reaches a maximum when the length is about 0.3 m. As the length increases, the response appears to become smaller, and at about 4 m it seems to be stabilized and becomes close to that of the infinite casing. Such behaviour was observed in the laboratory experiment conducted at the Richmond Field Station of the University of California at Berkeley (Becker et al 1998). It should be noted that there is a little deviation from the infinite casing as the vertical offset is increased, indicating that some leakage may exist through the ends of the casing segment.…”
Section: N U M E R I C a L E X A M P L E Smentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As the length is increased to 0.08 m and beyond, however, the response rapidly increases, and it reaches a maximum when the length is about 0.3 m. As the length increases, the response appears to become smaller, and at about 4 m it seems to be stabilized and becomes close to that of the infinite casing. Such behaviour was observed in the laboratory experiment conducted at the Richmond Field Station of the University of California at Berkeley (Becker et al 1998). It should be noted that there is a little deviation from the infinite casing as the vertical offset is increased, indicating that some leakage may exist through the ends of the casing segment.…”
Section: N U M E R I C a L E X A M P L E Smentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Field calculations have been made inside the cased borehole as well as in another borehole which is not cased. Although there is adequate sensitivity in the anomaly observed in a cross-borehole configuration, it is important to remember that the knowledge of casing properties is a prerequisite to the proper interpretation of the data thus obtained (Becker et al 1998;Lee et al 1998). The measurement in a single-borehole configuration (not shown here), however, turns out to be insensitive to the formation resistivity.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this subject is beyond the scope of this paper. Becker et al (1998) and downhole EM equipment manufactures are currently working on systems and data-processing techniques to remove the casing response from data prior to inversion.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%