2013
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface architecture of the Boulder Creek Critical Zone Observatory from electrical resistivity tomography

Abstract: The architecture of the critical zone includes the distribution, thickness, and contacts of various types of slope deposits and weathering products such as saprolite and weathered bedrock resting on solid bedrock. A quantitative analysis of architecture is necessary for many model-driven approaches used by pedologic, geomorphic, hydrologic or biologic studies. We have used electrical resistivity tomography, a well-established geophysical technique causing minimum surficial disturbance, to portray the subsurfac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements were taken at a frequency of 4·16 Hz and current of 0·1 to 5·0 mA which results in potentials up to 750 mV. In general we followed the protocol used and described in detail in Leopold et al (2013). If the repetition was outside the limit of 3%, the point was measured six times with a subsequent averaging.…”
Section: Geophysical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were taken at a frequency of 4·16 Hz and current of 0·1 to 5·0 mA which results in potentials up to 750 mV. In general we followed the protocol used and described in detail in Leopold et al (2013). If the repetition was outside the limit of 3%, the point was measured six times with a subsequent averaging.…”
Section: Geophysical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, geophysical measurements can be gathered in focused surveys designed to systematically and noninvasively explore the deep CZ over broad spatial scales (e.g., Parsekian et al, 2015;Robinson et al, 2008). CZ researchers have increasingly used them to document lateral and vertical variability in regolith properties (Befus et al, 2011;Holbrook et al, 2014;Leopold et al, 2008Leopold et al, , 2013Olona et al, 2010;Orlando et al, 2016), to estimate bedrock fracture density (Clarke & Burbank, 2011;Heincke et al, 2006), to determine shallow aquifer structure (Garambois et al, 2002;Gburek et al, 1999;Gburek & Urban, 1990;McClymont et al, 2011;Pasquet et al, 2015), to constrain depth to bedrock (Mills, 1990;Nyquist et al, 1996;Pavich, 1986), and to explore the relationship between topographic stress and fracture density . One drawback is that indirect measurements from geophysical tools can be ambiguous about variations in subsurface properties unless boreholes are drilled along the survey lines for calibration through direct observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periglacial processes episodically sorted regolith, creating lenses and local channels composed of pebbles to cobble gravel separated by more poorly sorted layers of fines, rubble derived from fractured bedrock, and aeolian material (Leopold et al, ). The shallow subsurface thus is vertically and laterally variable and includes buried zones of higher permeability (paleochannels) in the regolith that are the primary conduits for subsurface water in the alpine zone (Leopold, Huber, Dethier, & Weihenstephan, ; Leopold, Lewis, Dethier, Caine, & Williams, ; Williams et al, ) and in at least some adjacent areas (Figure ).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%