2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12039-021-01917-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate sulfoxidation by a biomimetic cytochrome P450 Compound I mimic: How do porphyrin and phthalocyanine equatorial ligands compare?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because there is no crystal structure of CyaH available, the computational model system was set up with an oxo-iron­(IV)­(porphyrin +· ) complex, Fe 4+ O 2– (C 20 N 4 H 12 ) − (SH) − , as the model of compound I (CpdI) of the P450 CyaH. The nonpolar enzymatic environment was mimicked with the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM, chlorobenzene (ε = 5.62) was employed as the solvent) in the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) calculations. The coordinate of the reagent cyanogramide D (Scheme d) was obtained from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with the deposition number CCDC-1956558 .…”
Section: Computation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is no crystal structure of CyaH available, the computational model system was set up with an oxo-iron­(IV)­(porphyrin +· ) complex, Fe 4+ O 2– (C 20 N 4 H 12 ) − (SH) − , as the model of compound I (CpdI) of the P450 CyaH. The nonpolar enzymatic environment was mimicked with the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM, chlorobenzene (ε = 5.62) was employed as the solvent) in the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) calculations. The coordinate of the reagent cyanogramide D (Scheme d) was obtained from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with the deposition number CCDC-1956558 .…”
Section: Computation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reactivity of peroxides bound to a metal ion is remarkably diverse and the factors dictating the particular mode of reactivity are continuously debated. Homolytic and heterolytic O–O bond cleavages have been observed in a variety of complexes and, among the different factors that can influence the reactivity, interactions related to the substrate–catalyst recognition event have attracted increasing interest being central in the final outcome, in particular for stereoselective processes. Even if the mechanism of oxygen transfer continues to be a controversial subject, widely accepted is that a “Sharpless type” pathway is involved in the oxidation step (Scheme , path a) and the active species is an η 2 coordinated alkyl (or hydro) peroxo complex. The nucleophilic attack of the substrate to the electrophilic peroxo oxygen follows the antibonding σ* orbital (O 1 –O 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%